http://www.supremecourtus.gov/oral_a...pts/07-290.pdf
I listened to most of it at work today I really like some of the judges comments. Other times I had to walk away before I blew a gasket all in all I think it will go our way.
The one part that really got me so mad I had to walk away was when they disussed the milita. The jackasses arguing did not have a damn clue about the founding of this country much less the meaning of the 2A.
The militia portion of the 2A is simply acknowledging the fact that the reason WE THE PEOPLE have the figgin right to bear arms is so we can infact form a militia if the need arises.
[Rant1]
thanks, read it ,will see what they say ,ya never know
I hope things work out with this! It was on the news in the airport the other day. I think they did a decent job keeping things from being too biased.
Hopefully things will work out with this whole mess and the SP says its an individual right and they tell DC to go shove it...and give the citizens their rights back.
I heard an interesting comment, there hasn't been a need for a law in our history (or a significant portion of British) to outlaw the militia's.. they've always been focused on banning the weapons, thus negating the potential for a viable militia.Quote:
Originally Posted by HunterCO
Some of the comments from the bench were hilarious though. You do have to wonder if the Solicitor General (Presidential rep) and the Heller attorneys had really prepared for their turns at the podium. Add to that all of their rhetoric about acceptable controls, hell even taking the Canadian stance on requiring "vaults" just got my nads in a wad!