In a different situation, the point of making an example of an offender to send a message to the rest of that industry is often employed and lauded. Why are things different in this case? In all fairness, I believe the company he was driving for is partly responsible for assigning him a mountain route if he is an inexperienced driver. That may still happen, we may not have gotten to that point yet. But if his sentence sends a message through the trucking industry that you better regularly improve your skills, then good.
Anyone who gets behind the wheel of a vehicle is responsible for the damage it may impose from their lack of skill. I have seen too many people driving down that grade with smoking brakes because they didnt know what they were doing. But, small car, so give them a pass? I dont think so.

