Fenberg from Boulder hasn't signed on? That will change if it passes the house.Quote:
Originally Posted by OneGuy67
Printable View
Fenberg from Boulder hasn't signed on? That will change if it passes the house.Quote:
Originally Posted by OneGuy67
I was thinking Tom Sullivan from Arapahoe would, but so, no Senate sponsors. It will pass the House with no problem...unfortunately.Quote:
Originally Posted by def90
Senators cannot sponsor a House bill.
Once a bill passes the House, it goes through the process again in the Senate.Quote:
Originally Posted by eddiememphis
It is introduced and sponsored by a member of the Senate.
If no Senator chooses to introduce and sponsor, it seems to fade away.
https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/defau..._law_chart.pdf
For politically "important" bills, there can be simultaneous introduction in the house and senate. Of course, that oftet results in two different amended version of the bill that much be reconciled. Perhaps the Senate is waitng on the "final" version of the house bill as a starting point. The one thing I have learned is that the state legislative session is far too long, permits plenty of gamesmanship to circumvent citizens. The new limitation on public accessibility to phone texts, etc, allows the vote tally to occur off-record even before a hearing occurs. How else do think Epps could say she already knows "how everyone will vote".
"HB24-1348 Secure Firearm Storage in a Vehicle" is on it's 3rd reading today, along with the 2nd reading of 1292.
1348 passes 41-22
So fucking stupid...
Unenforceable.
How can they prove you didn't have it in the trunk or locked glovebox?
One more feel good, do absolutely nothing law.
Not sure why any cares or pays attention to this clownish legislation. This is a distraction from far more important proposed foolishness.
1292 pushed back until tomorrow
Any updates?
Cannot find anything new on the web or news, like it fell off the news cycle...
Bug or feature?