Ah, ok. That's good to know. I thought that was one way he could use an EO to help his cause. Glad I was wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zundfolge
Printable View
Ah, ok. That's good to know. I thought that was one way he could use an EO to help his cause. Glad I was wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zundfolge
he is looking at everything he can do by eo, what would be the difference in adding it to the NFA or making registration manadory, and making all sales go FFL, so its not on the official NFA list, the results are the same, there will be a tax added to it and you will have had to register your firearm to keep it, I would expect that you may have to also fill out a 4473 on anything you bought FTFQuote:
Originally Posted by Zundfolge
i see the results as the same
What about: Cobray Street Sweeper, Striker 12, USAS-12? Weren't all three shotguns declared NFA via EO under Clinton?Quote:
Originally Posted by Zundfolge
DD. Destructive DevicesQuote:
Originally Posted by Clint45
They already fell under one of the definitions of a destructive device (bore over .5").Quote:
Originally Posted by Clint45
There is nothing about semi auto rifles or large capacity magazines that already exists in the law so the law would have to be changed to accommodate moving them to NFA status.
That's not to say Oblowme might not try it anyway, but there would be a legal pretext to overturn his EO.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...n_control.html
Meese: Obama Could Be Impeached If He Uses Executive Order For Gun Control
The problem with everyone salivating about impeachment is there is no way they will get the requisite votes to convict him in Harry Reid's Senate even if the House were to pass articles of impeachment. Get back to nagging state and federal representatives to focus on things that work and dropping measures that violate the Constitution.
SC leading the way introducing a bill to take the spirit of the Firearms Freedom Act and apply it to EO's
http://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess120_.../bills/224.htm