PRESIDENT TRUMP!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aardvark

all talk aside....PRESIDENT TRUMP. I just can't say that without a smile.

---

I just can't say it without getting a little sick to my stomach.

Better than the alternative though. If I had to say "President Clinton" (again) I'd throw up in my mouth a bit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by foxtrot

They might have intentionally timed the transfer of power as well when the country was founded. I think long before their tears are immediately freezing to their face and they have to protest on top of three foot snowdrifts in Chicago and NY, suddenly the motivation to change the world will be lost [LOL]Social Justice panty-waisters are not generally known for "resilience".

---

I had the same thought.

Presidential inaugurations used to take place on March 4th, unless it was a Sunday. In 1937, the date was changed to January 20th through the 20th Amendment to the US Constitution.

March 4, 1789 is the day the U.S. Constitution took effect and this is the reason for the original inauguration date. Members of Congress begin their term on January 3rd, also changed from March by the 20th Amendment.

This date change by the 20th Amendment shortens the lame duck session of Congress and the Executive branch by moving the beginning of their terms closer to the election in November. Sorry, weather didn't have much impact on the choice of dates.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DireWolf

That perception (fully assisted by corrupt MSM) would undoubtedly be presented, but I say so what?

The way I figure, a large percentage of those who would perceive that in the most negative way are already lost causes for the most part and will remain as either active seditionists or passive commie supporters until they're no longer inflicting us with their existence (the latter could just wake up or GTFO and there would be no issue), are fully irrelevant except for consideration as traitors, seditionists, and potential enemy combatants, and in some cases very likely deserve their own personal appointment with the hangman...(there will also be some more rational disagreement, but that's just the way things are, and not a bad thing).

Also, for someone like Soros, I can't imaging a $500M fine being a critical setback, not when these people are up or down a billion dollars on any given day based on the market...

So, Prepare the case and full list of charges, live press conference to present to the world, and after reading the charges/condemnation, add in a live sat/bomber feed and incinerate their mansions/compounds/aircraft/etc. on live global TV. Wherever they are...period. and a follow-up message that we're done fucking around and that actively working to destroy our nation and incite global wars will carry the ultimate penalty, regardless of where or who they are.

Remember, it's easier to ask for forgiveness than permission.

[snip]

---

That $500M is for one person. One. If Soros succeeds in starting a conflict here that legal precedent would bury him, and uninstall his shitstain son as well. The Soros line stranglehold on the world would be broken. And it needs to be. I have nothing against wealthy people but Soros is 100% evil even before he had resources like this (WWII).

I believe there could be a time when it's morally acceptable to go after someone like Soros in an unprecedented manner but he'd have to get a lot of people killed first for Americans to shift their thinking. I believe our current framework of laws could be used as well depending on what happens.

The good news is that the perception of legitimacy has shifted from them to us so we should be very careful not to lose it. It might very be necessary to set the record straight on what's coming.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gman

How critical religion is to the function of democracy (Professor Clay Christensen of the Harvard Business School);
[snip]

---

Good vid. I don't think everyone needs to have the same religion but at least respect the founding values. And that isn't the case anymore.

The Donald is on 60 Mnutes right now and said that any SCOTUS appointee he makes will be Pro Life & "very pro Second Amendment".

Promising.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by theGinsue

The Donald is on 60 Mnutes right now and said that any SCOTUS appointee he makes will be Pro Life & "very pro Second Amendment".

Promising.

---

Very promising. Thanks for the update.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by theGinsue

The Donald is on 60 Mnutes right now and said that any SCOTUS appointee he makes will be Pro Life & "very pro Second Amendment".

Promising.

---

Can't tell you how disappointed i was then, as some will be down the road.

Look here's the facts (as i see it) While Donald my be "conservative" on some things. His time in NY says he's to the left of Hillary on others.

I'm not sure of Hillary was Jeb Bush in drag, or the other way around. Am i happy DT won, absolutely primarily for these 2 (3) words THE SUPREME COURT.

The other reason. it hopefully put an end to Hillarys existence in politics as we know it. Fuk her for believing she deserved to be president.

WTF? 2 sites overlap