Son's attendance at a concealed course uncovered these "facts" I was not aware of:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ah Pook

I'd ask for my money back.

---

Me too.

Ranger Stations are considered federal property. You can now conceal carry in RMNP, for example, but you can't legally go in the visitor centers or ranger stations with your firearm.

"Any place a federal employee works" is false, it has to be a federal structure.

Sounds like they need to update there course pack

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blacklabel

It's a case of you get what you pay for... $49 for a CCW class?

I'm no proponent of mandatory training but if you're going to get it, get it through someone that knows what they're talking about.

---

Yep, this^^

You really do get what you pay for. I would ask for a refund and if your interested you are welcome to have your son and wife attend one of our classes and they can take a good course

I did not know about the post office issue, but I don't thing I'v been in a post office in years. I'll have to read up on the federal property issues. Thanks for everyones input.

You sure this wasn't a part of a multiple choice test? Sure is a lot of misinformation in there.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blacklabel

It's a case of you get what you pay for... $49 for a CCW class?

I'm no proponent of mandatory training but if you're going to get it, get it through someone that knows what they're talking about.

---

Ahh shit... thats about what I payed for JIM to teach his class. I knew there was something off about him... Must be all the tattoos! [ROFL2]

As others have already said almost all of that is incorrect.

The fellow who taught the class responded with many answers and most seemed very reasonable. I'll get his permission first, then post the answers here.
bob

ill be interested to see those