Out of State and 1224

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jim

Why not ups them to you prior to 7/1? Hhe ships from him to him, once in CO he takes possession of the mags he sent prior to Law in effect date.

---

Continuous possession part?
What a CF. I got nothing on this garbage law.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jeffrey Lebowski

Continuous possession part?
What a CF. I got nothing on this garbage law.

---

He's been in continuous possession. The mags were never transferred, sold or in actual possession of anyone.
Besides who fvkin cares. I'm not going to drop a dime on him, are you. or anyone else??

Ronin tell your friend to ship them to me with his name to & from. I'll write him a receipt for storage. This way his personal belongings were in CO prior to 7/1. The only one with access to his storage area is him, as they will be in a secure area.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jim

He's been in continuous possession. The mags were never transferred, sold or in actual possession of anyone.
Besides who fvkin cares. I'm not going to drop a dime on him, are you. or anyone else??

---

The 4th sentence would seem to indicate you haven't completely convinced yourself of your first two sentences. $0.02
What is there to "drop a dime" on if the assertions are true?
I know I'm certainly not convinced by sentence 1 and 2, but to that point and to your question as well - no, I don't care what anyone does in regards to this.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MarkCO

That would be Jeffco. FWIW, Mink is likely not running for another term and you can bet your bottom dollar the libs are going to pony up someone most of us won't enjoy.

---

Yep... I live in the same county. And actually Mink is term limited, he's retiring next year.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jeffrey Lebowski

The 4th sentence would seem to indicate you haven't completely convinced yourself of your first two sentences. $0.02
What is there to "drop a dime" on if the assertions are true?
I know I'm certainly not convinced by sentence 1 and 2, but to that point and to your question as well - no, I don't care what anyone does in regards to this.

---

each sentence should have been entered as a separate entity.
What's that Sgt Schultz saying? I no Nothing

To many folks are stressed out over what IMHO, is nothing more than an ineffective feel good, Lib anti gun agenda law. Like any other "law' unless you're doing something so illegal the mag cap is one more charge. Is anyone going to really enforce it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jim

each sentence should have been entered as a separate entity.
What's that Sgt Schultz saying? I no Nothing

To many folks are stressed out over what IMHO, is nothing more than an ineffective feel good, Lib anti gun agenda law. Like any other "law' unless you're doing something so illegal the mag cap is one more charge. Is anyone going to really enforce it?

---

When all but IIRC 10 CO Sheriffs say that due to the ambiguity and vague wording of the law they will not enforce it and it will not be a priority, I think we have nothing to really fear. I just sent an email to my buddy saying that he shouldn't have much to worry about, and to just do as we do- Don't ask, don't tell, don't go flashing your "evil 15+ round mags" around and you should be fine. Or, a modified version of a famous Rick James quote: "Fuck yo mag ban."