So would this set presidents for any future prosecutions; those unrelated to the floods?
Printable View
So would this set presidents for any future prosecutions; those unrelated to the floods?
It's the same mentality you see posted here and other gun forums when the OP ask, "If i have CCW and the sign says NO GUNS, What should i do?"Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinelement
I'm glad he's not not going to charge people.
it just baffles my mind why some people would ask him.
"Mother may I"
A precedent usually comes from a related court decision, not a DA's stand on a particular law.Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperiorDG
I'd be curious to see how Rhonda fields would respond to this little predicament...
I don't think Rhonda Fields understands anything about guns or how the new gun laws work.
ETA: Or should I say, how the gun laws don't work.
The stupid fuds that showed up in support of this crap would do exactly that to show that they are good subjects, right up until they try to take away their toys then they'd act all outraged and shocked.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinelement
Didn't the Larimer County Sheriff say the same thing? Matters not to me why they're taking this stand as long as they keep their word.
Ken kept his word regarding illegals in weld cty, BUT the flag burners (ACLU) and liberal leaning judge ruled otherwise.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bailey Guns
While i don't feel Ken Buck has the chance for a R win. He and the Buck Family are nice folks, unfortunately nice doesn't guarantee a win.