worthless F's.
worthless F's.
Actually all they have to show is a substantial government interest in restricting the sale to/for minors. They can get some liberal fuck to say 'this will save children'. Then bam, no first amendment protection.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin13
Again, see the SCOTUS cases dealing with smoking related merchandising.
Yup....this^^^Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperiorDG
you all missed the entire proposed law "she" authored
http://dailycaller.com/2014/07/19/bl...gun-manifesto/
The report also advocates a federal “assault weapon” and “large” magazine ban more severe than the one in effect between 1994 and 2004, gun owner licensing, repealing Stand Your Ground laws, opposing national Right-to-Carry reciprocity, empowering the Consumer Products Safety Commission to regulate the manufacture of firearms, prohibiting unlicensed and mail order ammunition sales, reporting people who purchase 1,000 or more rounds, removing restrictions on public access to BATFE firearm trace data, repealing the federal law that prohibits frivolous lawsuits designed to bankrupt the firearm industry, requiring “ballistic fingerprinting,” pursuing “smart” gun technologies, and using taxpayer funds to pay for “research” that promotes gun control.
BLOOMBERG UBER ALLES
This isn't going anywhere ... its grandstanding to make the dem base happy. That said it does really show their totalitarian impulse and can be used to instruct fence sitters on the evil that is the Democrat party.