I had to do low cholesterol a few years back. EVERYTHING that was LC was high Sodium and vice versa.
Printable View
Budreaux: I had an uncle that raised GMO chickens with four drumsticks.
Clereaux: How did they taste?
Budreaux: No idea. Never could catch one.
As a general principle, I don't mind GMOs. I feel there's probably a lot more hype than substance. Heck, anything can cause cancer, just ask California, everything causes cancer there!
And after all, to a starving kid in Africa, would they rather have a GMO ear of corn, or be told "You can't have that corn, because if you eat 10 pounds of it a day every day for 30 years you'll get cancer?"
Thank you for this thread.
I don't concern myself with GMO, like BG said, I've been eating it for 50 years and i'm in good health.
I only see this as a way to get rid of the farmers and those "not playing ball". GMO's aren't going anywhere. Population is too big. So labeling them isn't really doing anything besides making another obstacle for the locals to jump over. Just like the gun crap. Create a fear, use it to legislate. IF we really cared about GMO's and our health, McDonalds, Burger King etc would be out of business.
I could be way off though.
If it wasn't for GMO/Monsanto our food costs would be such that only the most wealthy could afford to eat three meals a day. I'm not saying I'm all for them but we don't have a better answer currently. I also feel that the GMO talking point has been done to death by those who watch loser TV all day and buy everything fed to them hook, line and sinker w/o even questioning. Until there is independent research done that PROVES unequivocally that that it's bad for us or causes any harm at all... STFU. Not you or anyone in this thread just in general. I'm SO sick of GMO this and GMO that and to me it's just an arbitrary set of letters because I have seen nothing that shows it's actually bad for us. Having a more firm understanding of the human body than most I find it hard to believe that GMO means bad automatically. It sounds bad if taken at face value and if you blindly subscribe to whatever fear mongering the masses are currently pushing but if you really look at it logically and honestly... where's the danger? People don't realize that w/o GMO/Monsanto we would have been bankrupt as a country probably decades ago as food prices would have sky-rocketed to an unimaginable figure based on current population and food demands.
This flip side to this coin is that food labels should be SIMPLE and easy to understand for everyone. Every time we add a new law requiring another label or measurement it makes things just a little bit more complicated. So from that aspect is adding something that we can't even prove affects you one way or the other a good idea? To me... no. Now if it's somehow proven to be bad for you to ANY degree then we have a discussion to have. Until then it's just knee-jerk by the brainwashed masses IMO.
I don't think it causes any harm. Ironic how it is yuppie housewives raising the panic. They are fat and happy and have no idea how agricultural advances feed billions.
I saw someone post that they thought microwaving food changed it chemically, such that it harms people. Oyy!!
[too lazy to use meme generator]
Genetically modify plants and animals for thousands of years with selective breeding and nobody bats an eye.
[photo of Heath Ledger as the Joker]
Genetically modify plants and animals with some beakers and a Bunsen burner and everyone loses their minds.
[/too lazy to use meme generator]
In terms of body composition, there is no difference between simple sugar and other carbohydrate sources. Furthermore, assuming you utilize the carbs or glycogen stores before they are converted to fat, the body response in negligible. Some will site a deviance in cortisol or insulin, but assuming you actually get regular strenuous cardiovascular, respiratory, and musculo-skeletal exercise, sugar poses you no threat and is actually a highly-effective short term fuel source.