We already have CCW reciprocity - it is called the 2nd amendment - each state signed on to the 2nd when they joined the union
We already have CCW reciprocity - it is called the 2nd amendment - each state signed on to the 2nd when they joined the union
Damn it read my reply about this in the other thread. The logic is totally and completely flawed and shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the ruling and basic law.
This is the problem with people basing their opiniona on short, carefully chosen to support their side, excerpts from the media vs. reading the opinion itself.
The court goes through a whole bunch of gyrations and acrobatics to say why marriage is a special social construct and as such needs/has to be applied everywhere.
We have had the 14th ammendment for a long time, and we even had a SCOTUS ruling about its application to restrictive gun laws (hint: we won). But nothing there says that a license must be honored everywhere. Again, see the gymnastics mentioned above
I'm so glad I'm a heterosexual, white Christian male and can pretty much do whatever I want in this country.
The constitution is irrelevant ... we no longer live in a Constitutional Republic, we live in an Administrative/Bureaucratic State under a Judicial Oligarchy that uses "constitutional arguments" as window dressing for "rule by fiat".
For that matter discussion of "the law" is irrelevant as "the law" is whatever whomever has the power to enforce it says it is.
Things are going to get interesting.