Background Check Fee drops to $6 on Mar 1, 2016

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by foxtrot

They've slightly adjusted the gun tax again.

Meanwhile, the states that are letting the feds process are charging people $0.00.

---

But that's because we have to pay for extra people to run the same check in parallel to the feds! Jobs program!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Great-Kazoo

Which is Optional. If they're going to deny on a voluntary question. Change it to mandatory, or don't have it at all. IF Voters had to jump through the checks gun owners do, there would be an uprising. After the community organizers rounded up enough buses ;)

---

^ THIS

And I never provide the number which was never intended to be a means of identification.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Great-Kazoo

Which is Optional. If they're going to deny on a voluntary question. Change it to mandatory, or don't have it at all. IF Voters had to jump through the checks gun owners do, there would be an uprising. After the community organizers rounded up enough buses ;)

---

What I love is the logical disconnect in liberals when you make the comparison. "Doesn't matter, guns kill!" as if politics never has.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zundfolge

I don't like paying for the BGC, but I do like that its the CBI and not the Feds that we do our BGCs with here. Not involving the Fed.Gov is worth the $6-10.

Now I don't like doing a BGC on a private sale at all, nor do I like the mag ban, but one thing at a time.

---

The CBI denies a disproportionally high number of checks. The also have a disproportionally high number of sustained appeals. The CBI is doing a poor job. I'd rather see the the Feds take over. While I'm not a fan of the either system the CBI is worse then the Feds.

Mike