So what is your take on the Alt/New Right?

Don't feed the trolls

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JohnnyDrama

I think ColoradoMinuteMan nailed it.

The New/Alt Right are the conservatives who got tired of the pussycat Republicans who rolled over whenever the Leftists moved their agenda along.

---

I agree.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Great-Kazoo

it's the lefts new moniker for those they disagree with. Since the RACIST / RACISM terms have failed them. As it did here in CO when they used WAR ON WOMAN in the Udall / Gardner contest

However. anything i hear or read from the Alt-Wrong i ignore as more futile ramblings of the weak.

---

Alt-Wrong.. LOL I like it. Alt-Wrong = (D) and their worthless "feelz".

A label intended to distract conservatives from the final trashing of the US as Obama slinks around doing the most damage he can in the last month.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ColoradoMinuteMan

In my opinion, Alt Right is a contrived term to put conservatives in a box and then assign common, negative beliefs and attitudes towards them. Liberals have tried for many years to make everyone believe that Republicans are all a bunch of homophobic, racist, bigots of one sort of another. Now that they have been saying it for so long that it has been disproven, they are embracing a new way of marketing it. Basically now they are saying "well this new fringe Alt right, who aren't even republicans have hijacked the Republican Party. These Alt right guys are the Skinheads, and unsavory people and people who believe in government destabilization. Republicans need to go out of their way and renounce these causes penny default you believe in them and you are part of the Alt Right. " it's just a branding war against conservatism plain and simple. It's designed to continue the myth that most of he Republican and Libertarian party are just a bunch of racist Skinheads, and convince those low information Republicans to be self haters, vote for spineless, ineffective, low energy, elitist, or liberal minded Republicans like John Kasich, Jeb Bush, and Mitch McConnell. People who are happy just getting elected and voting on legislation across party lines, not introducing anything controversial, not resisting the liberal wave of activist legislation, and never try and advance a conservative agenda. They are scared by people like Cruz, Trump, Santorum, etc who actually have an agenda, who intend to peruse it, and who aren't looking to just be absorbed by the party collective and assume the position of subordinating to the elitists.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

Nailed it. Same rhetoric when the left referred to anything to do with the TEA party.

What "Alt-Right" folks are you all paying attention to? I asked OP to define and he has not done so.

It's kinda like saying, "What do you all think of Communists?" Well that's kind of a loaded question unless I define Communists and what I mean by that, cus some little snowflake who is in a commune and believes in community ownership is a far cry different from Mao.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CavSct1983

I'd first ask what you define/see as being under the umbrella of that label (actual groups, persons, etc.), how you define their views (or rather, understand their views to be defined), etc. to make sure of what you are viewing as such.

---

Agreed. I've heard the term many times, but only from people/news sources that would not identify as "conservative" themselves.

Like "Neo-Conservative", the term has become meaningless. It simply means "Someone I disagree with, even if I can't express why." It took months for Neo-Conservative to become so debased. It took about a week for "Alt-Right" to become so meaningless.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SG1

What is your take?

---

What is your take on "fake news?"

Don't bother answering. I don't care.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CavSct1983

What "Alt-Right" folks are you all paying attention to? I asked OP to define and he has not done so.

It's kinda like saying, "What do you all think of Communists?" Well that's kind of a loaded question unless I define Communists and what I mean by that, cus some little snowflake who is in a commune and believes in community ownership is a far cry different from Mao.

---

Vox day is great, love his writings on immigration, Stefan molyneux has great vids, alot of podcasts are really funny to listen to.

More or less I see the Alt/new right as the future as the Neo Cons/Cucknservatives have done everything in their power to lose, not wield power when they win, and fear being called "racist" more then losing the nation, culture, freedoms they claim to value..

The Alt Right does not care one bit and it works so well, the left can only scream names, bring up facts, and a better vision of the future to the fence sitters/ and hell more and more of the white groups of the DNC.

If we restrict immigration like we did in 1924, build the wall/deport them all, end birth right ciztenship, along with Federal voter ID laws we can really turn the tide in our favor, something those cucks like McLame and Graham would rather die then support even if it means their party being unable to win any election again because of the left importing hordes of voters because "muh principles".

Neo Cons/Kempism is 50-60 years of proven failure...And its great to see they are being seen for what they are, fools and sellouts.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by spqrzilla

Like "Neo-Conservative", the term has become meaningless. It simply means "Someone I disagree with, even if I can't express why." It took months for Neo-Conservative to become so debased. It took about a week for "Alt-Right" to become so meaningless.

---

Wrong.

Neo consism has very well defined values.

Open Borders
Mass immigration
GDP over national security/culture
Imperialism
"Compromise" on major issues
Surrender on major issues before any debate has taken/place
Israel/Globalists First America last