Sums it up nicely:
The only reason any politician promotes restricted public access to firearms is because they intend to do things for which they rightly should be shot.
Printable View
Sums it up nicely:
The only reason any politician promotes restricted public access to firearms is because they intend to do things for which they rightly should be shot.
Another one lets the mask slip...
(She deleted these tweets and locked her account)
https://twitter.com/kungfuman316/sta...54878273658881
https://imgur.com/naFbIDZ.jpg
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skip
No bitch, your the EXACT reason we have the 2nd.
She also has no grasp of the meaning of "well regulated" in 18th century terminology.Quote:
Originally Posted by Skip
Agreed. If the left wanted to really strictly interpret the "well regulated Militia" part they'd have to issue us rifles, ammo and provide free public shooting ranges all over the place.Quote:
Originally Posted by .455_Hunter
Hmm, it would appear she is violating the law with making her account "Private"
“ “The First Amendment does not permit a public official who utilizes a social media account for all manner of official purposes to exclude persons from an otherwise‐open online dialogue because they expressed views with which the official disagrees,”
https://firstamendmentwatch.org/trum...twitter-block/
https://clairecelsi.com
https://www.instagram.com/clairecelsi/
Silly you...Quote:
Originally Posted by BPTactical
Those rules only apply to conservative political officials.
I think we're probably past a rational and accurate interpretation of 2A.Quote:
Originally Posted by .455_Hunter
Your right, there I go trying to toss logic and law into a lawless and illogical game.....Quote:
Originally Posted by .455_Hunter