Reason I asked, because one of them is bragging on mp.net -- will forward this with your permission.. [ROFL1]
Printable View
Reason I asked, because one of them is bragging on mp.net -- will forward this with your permission.. [ROFL1]
Anyone bragging about their exploits is certainly not a professional and everyone will see right through that. My critique of their actions is based upon what limited (although very conclusive) views available and could possibly be wrong; I don't have all of the pieces to be thorough. I'm sure that the footage is being eval'ed by others and my imput will only be looked on as that of an armchair general by someone who appears to be bragging about it online. You can do with the critique as you like as I believe that it will fall on deaf ears.
In their defense....Quote:
Originally Posted by coloccw
It's a Westland Lynx not a MH-60. I believe the navalized version ( just like a SH-60B) has only the starboard door the other is removed due to the sonobouy ejector racks on the port side of the aircraft.
My mistake. It's difficult to keep track of the many variants of -60's out there. Either way, support and insertion aircraft shoud be different to facilitate the boarding team's insertion and provide for cas-evac until mission competion. Similar to typical bounding overwatch movement techniques.
Oiy... regardless of the fractional information based critique, at least there are military actions being taken out in that neck of the woods (or ocean perse') and not a peace-nik tolerance of the pirate actions.
As for the reset, eh, fair fundamental assessment, but as noted, there is a distinct lack of the full picture. I haven't bailed out of a helicopter in a long damn time and I sure as hell haven't had to board and clear a ship, so I will refrain from passing judgment on the guys out on the sharp end.