Actually his predecessors earned it the hard way, the young'uns just happen to be fortunate enough to reap the rewards of those before them. Capitalism at it's best.
Either way, he's going to be hard pressed to beat pearlmutter.
Printable View
Just one more case of when the ultra rich can buy their way into office. Makes me sick. However, that being said, Coors seems like a decent candidate and so long as there is an (R) after his name then I'll support him if he is the candidate.
No matter what you think of California politics- we watched as two very wealthy titans of Silicon Valley spent more (personal) money than most people can count, only to lose their elections. Let's keep that trend goign in Colorado this time- don't let the rich buy this election!
I could really care less how much money a candidate may or may not have.
I care that they have the best interest of the people, State and Country in mind.
I agree 100%, however, sometimes THAT person doesn't get in office because their wealthy opponent outspent them in ads. I would prefer to see a matched funds campaign, no candidate can outspend the other in the final outcome - this would be a huge hit considering independents won't have the bucks and a lot of thought would have to be put behind this because there are so many ins and outs of it, but it would even the field at least a little.