what would Romney do?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dwalker460

This.

Hes a Mormon, and your not taking the Mormons guns.

---

RELIGION ASIDE. HE had no problem signing REASONABLE GUN LAWS in Mass. Or as he put it the law was a combined effort from both sides of the aisle.
There's UTAH Mormon and there's East Coast Mormon

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Uberjager

Romney would have united the pro-gun groups, and he would focus on the fact that our rights shouldn't be infringed. He would have then pressured congress into repealing the Hughes amendment, and he would have laid-down more pressure on congress to pass national, permit-less concealed carry.

---

Just like he did when he signed the Mass assault rifle ban?

I think he would have acknowlaged Sandy Hook Elementary school shooting as the tragic event it was, but kept his focus on pressing the senate to pass a budget and work on his agenda of job creation and the economy. Can't see him playing the Obama role and trying to use the event for people control.

You probably ought to do your research. That legislation was enacted by thier State Senate, as a joint effort between the pro-gun groups and the anti-gunners. Romney merely acted as an moderator between the two groups. He had no input, did not support the actions other than to help the two groups in an official capacity, and did not take further action. He is PRO-GUN people, always has been.

Romney=SSDG

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jim

RELIGION ASIDE. HE had no problem signing REASONABLE GUN LAWS in Mass. Or as he put it the law was a combined effort from both sides of the aisle.
There's UTAH Mormon and there's East Coast Mormon

---

Jim we both know that that deal ws done by the pro-gun and anti-gun groups in that state and he had nothing to do with it other than acting as a moderator, and to keep the pro-gun guys in the game and make sure thier voices were heard. Whether he signed it or not, that bill was happening in his State Senate. Much like is about to happen to us, when those Dems get organized here and ram this through the State legislature its not going to matter a bit who we have as Governor, and in fact we are going to be screwed because our gorvernor is NOT going to bring the pro-gun guys to the table and is not going to ensure we have our say.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bryjcom

I think he would have gone after the guns. And he would actually have an easier time doing it. He'd have some of the lame brain republicans go along with him and the dems wouldn't object at all. Be glad we have Obongo in....

---

I came into this thread to post this very thing. Romney is no friend of firearms. [Bang]

[off-yourself] that is what this thread makes me wanna do. I don't think Romney is some sort of 2A hero, but I don't think he'd be trying to ban guns right now either. If Romney hadn't of signed that bill in MA, you'd all be bitching about what a tyrant he was as governor.

He would of self deported

I heard he lip syncs when he prays [ROFL1]