Ate some bad fish? need to puke? LA times article about the folly of fighting tyranny.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Irving

What if there were FIVE Chris Dorner's, and they spread themselves out?

---

Exactly. Or 25, operating in groups of 2 or 3 using good guerrilla tactics and not holing up in a cabin with limited egress options. What this monkey-ass also isn't taking into account is the gov't isn't going to be driving tanks down main street firing indiscriminately at one or two bad guys...or using F-16s for airstrikes in downtown Omaha.

I'd say a few guys operating together would eventually be overwhelmed but not before they could wreak havoc on the LAPD.

consider the fact that a bunch of goat-pounders from the stone age have fought the two superpowers of the world for a combined length of more than 14 years with nothing more than small arms and stolen explosives and armaments.
its not the tool, but the heart of the weapon.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BPTactical

Lets not forget the black pajama guys of a little southeast Asian country.....

---

or some guys back in 1775.

right, nobody, not even the great General Custer, is going to win a shootout surrounded by a superior force with superior firepower.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by funkymonkey1111

or some guys back in 1775.

right, nobody, not even the great General Custer, is going to win a shootout surrounded by a superior force with superior firepower.

---

Or as byte mentioned. Will Power and the heart / conviction.

I think Byte is right, but have no idea how to proceed. Perhaps get the Sheriffs involved?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HoneyBadger

Funny, because I think I actually DID eat some bad fish for dinner... I've been shitting liquid ever since I finished doing the dishes.

---

Does this mean that you're temporarily giving a shit? Or ten? :-)

At the final bell the score was 4-1.

Gun owners outnumber police and military by at least an order of magnitude, right? Getting into a civil war is pretty far down my list of things I want to do, but in this case, the data show exactly the opposite of what the article wishes to "prove".

Has anybody read "Unintended Consequences" by John Ross?

I'm sick and tired of reading trash like this made by sub-humans.

I've yet to meet an AF pilot that says he'll be on the side of the government if/when SHTF. I've met plenty that say they won't be on that side.