Ask the Illini how it's working for them...[hahhah-no]
Printable View
Ask the Illini how it's working for them...[hahhah-no]
You need new friends...
I know you all would light the tires, and I agree with you all. The whole ak thing I agree with 2. I sent him a nice email stating that we should meet at the range and I would read him the constitutional amendments dealing with the state and federal and how those rights shall not be infringed. Then roflmao'n as he brags about his sks and romo.
I don't know what's worse. People that come out and say they hate guns and no one should have them, or this ple of shit for a plan...
that's why i live here, haven't talked to the guy in about 4 years.Quote:
Originally Posted by drew890
ANY form of licensure of guns or gun owners has only ONE purpose; confiscation.
So Molon Labe and "from my cold dead hands" and all that (and yes, I realize that a CHL may be just as bad)
Maybe my plan is to post his email on here so we can discuss it...blahahahahah
/start of email/Quote:
Originally Posted by buckshotbarlow
hope I have answered your questions below. They are great and got me to make a few changes. Keep them coming.
Here is an update to the Framework
It looks like the link to the PBS article did not make it out to everybody so:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/socia...own_02-18.html
On another note: I was called by IQ 106 out of Philadelphia. This is a local radio station in Philly that saw the PBS article and liked the Framework. I just did an interview with them and will be on in the morning. I doubt many of us (probably including myself) can just listen to them all morning. There is not a specific time for the interview, just a "you will be on the morning show". They do have a live stream though and she said she would try to get me an MP3 at some point. We will see.
Here is the link: http://www.iq1069.com/
I also have a friend in Missouri that looks like they may have me going on a radio station(s) there.
I have responses to some guy below:
On Feb 20, 2013, at 2:58 PM, some guy wrote:
> Things to consider:
> Instructor certifications - Issuing agency? State or Fed level?
Same as the current Carry Conceal rules are today. My understanding is that each state (even down to county) set the rules. If this were enacted at the Federal Level I would expect that to continue but possibly have baseline requirement(s)
> Inheriting guns. Can't without a license? What if they don't qualify for license, what happens to guns?
This makes it pretty simple. No License No Gun. If they don't qualify (in some time period) they may dispose of the guns as they see fit. Sell them, pass them onto another family member who does have a license, etc.
> Under 18 hunters - hunting allowed on learner license?
With a licensed hunter accompanying them. This what I was trying to get at under "Gun Possession" on page 6.
> Under 18 farm/ranch hands - legal to hire and part of their job to carry gun
> Current colorado law: no age requirement for rifles or shotguns, handguns ok but under 18 must be in presence of adult
No License No Gun
> How are private sales compliance recorded?
They are not. This is not a gun registration exercise, actually it is specifically the opposite. You are registering the people. Ammo, guns, anything else is not the point. This should make it easier for even FFL purchases (gun store) since the background check is a simple call to see if the license is in good standing. Currently if you purchase at gun shop A and then another at shop B that counts for 2 background checks. If you pick up the gun a shop A and then a day later buy another gun that requires a 3rd check. This is really wasteful. With the license you have a running standard. If you have a license, we all know you are in good standing after a call to a hotline. (BTW: in writing this I see that the whole hotline part has been left out. That has been fixed…… this is a framework that is meant to grow through excellent input like this)
> How do these two items co-exist? Can't the first be used to loophole the second?
> 1) Law enforcement shall validate gun licenses on request without requiring the reason for the verification.
> 2) Gun license data shall only be accessible to Law Enforcement
I don't see where there is an issue but in rereading that sentence I have changed it to the following:
"Law Enforcement may validate gun licenses on request without requiring a reason for the verification if a gun is visible or found during a lawful search"
> Allowed to file anonymous concerns? You can file anonymous crime reports
I think that would be reasonable.
/end of email/
The closest I can get to that is allowing CCW holders to not wait for a background check.
lived in IL for 10 years for the USAF. Had a TS Clearance and got my Firarms Owners Identification Card (FOID) revoked because I moved 2 blocks on the same Air Force base. Took a month to get a new one (it was expedited) while having a Beretta 92 waiting for me.Quote:
Originally Posted by TFOGGER