Quote:
Originally Posted by kidicarus13
IMHO, the kid has it right on - no legitimate reason at all to limit the amount of rounds held by magazines. What's lame about that?Quote:
Originally Posted by spqrzilla
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidicarus13
IMHO, the kid has it right on - no legitimate reason at all to limit the amount of rounds held by magazines. What's lame about that?Quote:
Originally Posted by spqrzilla
What's better than 30rds?
60rds.
what is better than 60 rds?Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBelly
120 rds.
Sure fire makes a 100 round mag commercially. As does the Koreans and the beta mag company.
Belt fed full autos are still legal if you have the cash. There is a potential for unlimited amounts of ammo on that belt.
I conclude with no mag limit should be applied.
Run up a mountain with that, tough guy![Coffee]Quote:
Originally Posted by DFBrews
That is what this summer is all about. Hike shoot to 400 yds repeat. Only way I can afford to feed the AR's. precise aimed fire. No more beta drum mag dumps into a wall of clays at 30 yardsQuote:
Originally Posted by TheBelly
Well, no, this is a direct response to the dims saying "There is no legitimate hunting or sporting reason for having
these magazines."
It pretty much proves that statement false.
Quote:
Originally Posted by spqrzilla
DfBrews I'd be interested in joining you for that!Quote:
Originally Posted by DFBrews
I'm sorry I thought this was America the greatest country in the history of the world, where we can have things we want not just the things we need.
The most precision we had came from the aviation folks.Quote:
Originally Posted by DFBrews