With the above thought in mind, I kinda wonder why no one is very interested in the gun safe that I have up for sale. May not totally keep law breakers from getting to the firearms but would sure slow them down in gaining access.Quote:
Originally Posted by lilpromisedland
because the law doesn't define Properly Secured and any lawyer worth a damn will say if it was stolen it wasn't properly secured. The fact that the thieves took 3 hours with an angle grinder while you were at work doesn't matter, it should have been properly secured.
/Tinfoil\
I have a suspicion that this bill is a sacrificial offering. It is so poorly written that I think/hope that it was put out there as a barter piece.
Let the moderate Dems vote against this trash to SEEM pro-gun in exchange for their votes on Mag limits and background checks.
I like how it just does away with the current laws that make it null and void.
“Because of the dangerous nature of assault weapons” they should only sell transfer or distribute them “after receiving sufficient communication and information to have reasonable grounds to believe that the weapon will not be possessed or used by a person who may use it unsafely or unlawfully.”
CBI & NCIC APPROVAL cleared the current owner from any criminal issues.
That is what the purpose of UBC was for is it not?