This tact will endanger a lot of Law Enforcement personnel and citizens health and safety.
Printable View
Also no law, as far as I can tell, making "adding a date " to a mag illegal.
EX: Maybe you want to have your birthday engraved on all mags you own for easy identification ? (for example)
The law only seems to address having a date code (engraved or embossed) on mags manufactured in CO after 01JUL13.
So you can have all your mags engraved with a Pre 01JUL13 date...if that will do any good.
Sen Lundberg stated that the mag ban is about PARTY POLITICS (those from Washington and from Mayor Bloomberg), not about safety.
I can't recall ONE DEM Sen. (except Hodge) that spoke on behalf of defending HB 1224.*
The DEMS did not HAVE to speak...they went into the bill wth a 20 to 15 lead. By speaking, they only risked the chance of LOSING a vote.
Dem Sen Hodge (I think ) spoke only a few times:
1) Introduced/Motioned the Bill & cited all the mass tragedies (including mistakenly VA Tech)
2) Asked for an AYE Vote on the bill
3) Asked for NAY Vote on proposed amendment #1
4) Asked for NAY Vote on proposed amendment #2
*(Updated: Let me correct myself. After reading some reports, I found that Sen Mike Johnston also spoke in favor of the bill; so 2 DEMS spoke)
The date code passed? I thought that was struck and they are just supposed to be "marked" somehow to designate they had been manufactured after the effective date, which BTW will be hard to convince manufacturers from out of state- meaning all of them now- to play along, and theres not jack they can do about it.