Security at Hick's mansion has been increased

Since Hick is a man of principals, will he insist that the State Troopers that provide his security forego their sidearms? Fewer guns equals more security, after all... [/sarcasm]

Increasing security on the (elite liberals) is always cost effective (+$550,000 a day x elite) with weapons that can hold 40 rounds per magazine, that is chump change!! The rest of us can go eat shit with weapons that can't hold more than 15 rounds per mag, and at the mercy of a police force that will show up after we're either dead, or in my case, when I deploy, my family will be dead!!

That's not hypocritical at all: "You can't have these magazines to protect yourself, but my security can to protect me"

I think he should make his residence a gun free zone.

All I can say is. Hey Dickinpooper, [goFyourself] [fyou] [ahole] Good luck with the Re-election!!!!!

id LMAO if say he slip and fell and broke his fukking neck

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sneakerd

Of course- they increase security at the mansion and Rhonda Fields says that they must increase security for legislative people and employees to protect them. But..... increasing security at schools would be .... ineffective. We just have to pass new laws restricting lawful gun owners.

---

^This! Incongruity at its finest. Sooooooo, tell me again, just exactly whom do they serve?

I like the fact that they are afraid of something. Gives me warm fuzzies.






BOO!!!

They should only be allowed to cary 15 rounds in thier mags.

[panic][panic][fail]

[AR15]