Printable View
Oh yea... now we've got the ATF guy who last time couldn't even remember the name of the "Clinton-era Attorney General" who personally tasked him with coming up with a plan to lower violence in 15 targeted cities. Wouldn't you know know the name of the Attorney General who "personally tasked" you with that?
Great. I need to move.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_RoP
I wonder if he'll talk about the Oklahoma City bombing this time like he did last time. When asked "would background checks have stopped the OKC bombing" his response last time was.... "uuuuuhhhhh... I suppose not!"
He just called the Brady Bill "like a flawed airport policy." Good, repeal it then.
So, which of you are going to directly refute his claims (ATF Shithead) and say directly that he is only here because he is being paid thousands of dollars to spread misinformation.
Again -- the NUMBER ONE WAY TO GET RID OF UNIVERSAL BACKGROUND CHECKS -- Call them bigots. Tell them that if they pass the law that they are discriminating against gay and lesbian couples.
Hey ATF guy 43 people die each day from drunk driving. What are you doing about it?
Correlation does NOT equal causation.
Fucktards.
Yeah, nice strawman he threw out there. Said BGC law repealed in Missouri resulted in a 25% increase in gun-related homicide.Quote:
Originally Posted by asmotao
430 die every day from lung cancer Mr. ATF.
Some chick just referred to "gun-rights extremists" thinking universal BGC being too burdensome for law-abiding gun-owners.
I feel for the speaker... but I would have to ask... how would background checks have saved her sister? Really!
Another person talking about a tragedy that would not have been prevented by a background check.
Her argument is the "burden" is all the emotions conjured by victims of gun violence. Her sister died at Sandy Hook. She's crying while she talks about how BGC will prevent guns from getting into the hands of people who will do harm and save lives.
And we're still trying to say that UBC would have prevented Sandy Hook. FFS.
It would not have, he failed one and then stole the weapons.Quote:
Originally Posted by brobar
I'm pretty sure that under this bill, his mother's estate could have been charged with an illegal transfer and the corpse held for up to 18 months.Quote:
Originally Posted by newracer
All of you -- please analyze how they are all doing their arguments.
Hyperbole and emotion. They do not listen to logic.
For those of you that get up to testify today - Do NOT base your entire argument on logic, you MUST step outside your comfort zone and get them to respond at an EMOTIONAL level. Call them out.
I know its easy to arm-chair quarterback here but I'm trying to help in any way. ;)
They are really pushing emotions, they must know the logic is flawed.
The Aurora shooter passed a background check!!!!!!
This guy says a majority of law enforcement supports this -- BULLSHIT.
These people will lie and stretch the truth. Do not be afraid to call them on it.
TIME IS UP!!!!!
I sure hope that when opponents testimony comes along... people will bring to the attention of the Senate and everyone there... universal background checks would NOT have prevented Aurora Theater and they would NOT have prevented Sandy Hook!
40% of all gun sales are with no BGC.
All they do is repeat the lies. These people are the worst of the worst
You can also bring up that in the current verbiage of the universal background checks bill, that as an NRA instructor I could not hand and unloaded weapon to a student while I am training them. It would require a 3 day, at current times, background check when I handed it to them - and other 3 day wait time when they hand it back to me. For a class of 10 students this would take 60 days.
Some teacher praising their students for doing the good job of HIDING in a lock down drill.
Gee what an American Hero
Mayor of Golden up. It's about to get thick.
Why does everyone think these background checks would stop school shootings? Would not have stopped Columbine, would not have stopped VT, would not have stopped Sandy Hook ...
I'm confused.
She's spouting the same false statistics she did last time.
Tom Mauser is up.
Because they don't care and this is just the tip of the gungrab iceberg.Quote:
Originally Posted by clublights
Here let me un-confuse you. Its not about that. They don't give one flying fuck. They want to make more criminals so the full force of the State can come crashing down on the undesirables.Quote:
Originally Posted by clublights
Its about control, if not guns, it is something else.
Hey Tom I'm wearing the underwear that I took off when I helped conceive my daughter. Big effing deal
We mark up prices for private sales because we don't have to subject someone to background checks.
Please explain...lol that is an interesting counterpoint.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lurch
Tom was wearing his kids shoes in tribute. Someone on the plan at the end made the comment nice shoes.Quote:
Originally Posted by PugnacAutMortem
Fudd, I mean Hunters Against Gun Violence. He hates the NRA because they defend our rights. Uses a surplus military weapon to hunt.
I'm trying to watch, but for some reason only get 3 seconds at a time. Thanks for the commentary guys.
I apologize for the interjection of my own opinion in advance.Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodburbon
This IS NOT about buying guns -- this is about even the temporary transfer (e.g. handing the gun to a buddy).