I was told they had 90% last night. Not sure if that's 90% of the required or the 25, 000 to be safe.
Printable View
I was told they had 90% last night. Not sure if that's 90% of the required or the 25, 000 to be safe.
I would not be surprised at all if this rumor proves to be true. The dims don't want to risk losing the majority.
http://coloradopeakpolitics.com/2013...ted-in-return/
I find it bullshit that they can resign at that point. Once the signatures get verified that should be the end of it, no chance to resign.
Actually I don't have a problem with them resigning, however if they do resign there should still be an election ... they shouldn't be able to resign just so their party can put an unelected crony in their seat and avoid the voice of the people.Quote:
Originally Posted by sniper7
Voice of the people is heard if the recalled official is gone. I don't want recalls happening just to swap the majority party but for real reasons.
If Hudak resigns, you will have a great victory. At that point, with no election, there is zero risk of balloting to go against us and the message of consequences for following Bloomberg's dictat is sent.
just donated at http://www.recallhudaktoo.org
Just getting the recall petition validated is a victory unto itself, and sends a loud message to the antis. I do expect Hudak will resign if enough signatures are validated, as the dems will do anything to avoid losing the senate majority. She doesn't enjoy the massive financial backing that Morse got, and is more on her own.
A comment to that article by Chris Rawlings is spot on and very well thought out.
If the D's just shove their lacky in Hudak's place that is further proof the D's are ignoring the will of the people and another finger is given to Colorado voters.
Agreed, she should not be allowed to resign and be forced to face her constituents.
Oh, and the author of that article is Eli Stokols who is as far left and in the D pocket deep
We're collecting signatures at 100th and Wadsworth and at 80th and Wadsworth.