Here's what dilbit is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dilbit
And here's some of the concerns:
http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs...wift072312.pdf
Printable View
Here's what dilbit is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dilbit
And here's some of the concerns:
http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs...wift072312.pdf
Bitumen is the stuff they mine from the tar sands. dilbit is the shit they want to ship through keystone, it's bitumen diluted so that it flows through the pipe. It's been transported for many years through pipelines, mostly in a safe manner. But there is some debate on the safety of transporting it.
I tried to avoid all 'sextual' connotations...
People are working on this and I agree to the extent of your comment that we need the jobs. A little research will solve the problems of transporting it.
Then again, we may not need Canuckistanian oil:
http://xfinity.comcast.net/articles/...S.US.Oil.Boom/
^
Is he an accountant? I tought he was a securities/ financial analyst.
:)
That was my speculation... he talks like my lil bro who is a partner CPA for a major firm but has his head up his butt. [ROFL1]
Good point, and it's all based on the price of oil. It has to stay above $75 a barrel, apparently, to make US oil drilling economically feasible. Once it falls below that, cheap Mideast oil is our best bet. What's better for America, producing more of the imports we need at $75+ with the resulting higher gas prices but higher employment, or importing cheap oil with cheaper gas but producing less ourselves with loss of oil industry jobs?
Also, is anyone still willing to have a dilbit pipeline run across their back yard now?
I never said I worked for a financial firm, or in that industry. My education is in math, accounting, operations management and combat engineering. I work in high tech supply chain.
Still, interesting that we could be the world's largest oil producer, neh? Whodathunk?