To the user with the offending avatar:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by twitchyfinger

Yeah kind of a bummer someone wants to keep it PG-13. The part that bothers me is the no explanation as to what IS acceptable and what is NOT. They just get deleted. Kind of make it hard to know how to play.[Twist]

---

I can understand the mods not wanting this to become a porn site, but women wearing skimpy bathing suits are frequently on network TV. I would wager most of us here (being straight men) are not offended by such pictures. Especially since they don't meet the definition of pornography.

That said, I will respect and abide by the rules even if I disagree with them. Kind of like being a gun owner in the United States isn't it?[Coffee]

http://www.strangecosmos.com/images/content/10112.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GreenScoutII

I can understand the mods not wanting this to become a porn site, but women wearing skimpy bathing suits are frequently on network TV. I would wager most of us here (being straight men) are not offended by such pictures. Especially since they don't meet the definition of pornography.

That said, I will respect and abide by the rules even if I disagree with them. Kind of like being a gun owner in the United States isn't it?[Coffee]

---

I can understand and respect the rules even If I disagree with them too. The only point I was trying to make was some communication would have worked great. A polite nice little post about what was or was not acceptable as far as posting pics would have been appreciated instead of just deleting them. It leaves people guessing like as to why those type of pics cannot be posted but can and are used as avatars.

We all know it's about hot chicks with guns....


http://www.uconline.co.uk/assets/ima...-with-guns.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by twitchyfinger

I can understand and respect the rules even If I disagree with them too. The only point I was trying to make was some communication would have worked great. A polite nice little post about what was or was not acceptable as far as posting pics would have been appreciated instead of just deleting them. It leaves people guessing like as to why those type of pics cannot be posted but can and are used as avatars.

---

Yeah, good point. I'm on your side on this issue. I'm sure there is a set of rules in the terms and conditions, but what exactly is "offensive" and by who's definition? It would be good to know. I don't think any of us want to piss off the mods or offend anyone, but how are attractive women posing with guns while wearing a bathing suit offensive? That is the point I was trying to make. No full nudity = NOT pornography.

Pretty much a good guideline is that if you would not mind your 5-10 year kid looking at it then its ok.

All of the stuff that was trimmed was not ok.

If you are unhappy with not being allowed to post pics of hot chicks with guns, please contact the admin staff or board owner, Roger.

only at 23 pages.

had to get rid of mine the wife saw it[Rant1]

ok she left[ROFL2]

Haha