Give 'em hell Dave!Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rat
(points to link in signature for those that don't know Dave Kopel).
Give 'em hell Dave!Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rat
(points to link in signature for those that don't know Dave Kopel).
That's pretty telling when the plaintiffs close after the first week... some of you might need to be more optimistic. *Fingers crossed*
I want to be optimistic but it's against my nature (whole frog and scorpion thing) ... here's keeping my fingers crossed though and praying I'm a cynical bastard for no reason [Luck]Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin13
If there is one thing I know about the politics of guns, it is that the trial is pointless and the decision was already made long before the trial even started. This judge knew what the decision would be before the trial even started. The actual trial is just a formality to make it look like everything was fair.
It's disgusting that "research" like that done by Webster (or climate "scientists" like Michael Mann) gets any support at all rather than getting them laughed out of academia. Their inferential reasoning ought to get a high schooler a repeat class but these bozos get federal funding and named chairs. They disgrace all scientific professions.
You mean it's not a fair process?! [Sarcasm2]Quote:
Originally Posted by KAPA
Is it fair to say the ruling will be appealed no matter what? Could it end up going to the Supreme Court? Would they take the case and if so what implications might that have for the rest of the country?
it will be appealed no matter what.. I won't got to SCOTUS - but may go to Colorado Supreme Court.Quote:
Originally Posted by Logan
Wrapping up today? I guess it doesn't really matter, we probably won't hear anything for months.
how exactly is a federal lawsuit going to be appealed to the Colorado Supreme Court?Quote:
Originally Posted by asmo