And he "Leads" our State.......

Hickenlooper has aspirations of national office. He'll lick whomever's boots he has to.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BigDee

There is "possibly" a shining light at the end of the tunnel.

My family is a bunch of California liberal democrats. They are the people who moved here from California and have changed the political climate of this state for the worse.

I had a barbecue today and asked them how they feel about Hickenlooper. They all said he's a spineless coward and despite their hatred of Republicans they hate Hickenlooper so much they will either not vote or vote for a republican in the next election because they will not vote for Hickenlooper again. They also now hate Obama because they have come to the realization that he makes GW Bush look like an amazing leader.

---

[ROFL1]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BPTactical

There, IFIFY

---

So true Bert, so true. I keep encountering people on Facebook who don't want to recall Morse because it's "out of state interests, extremists, and the NRA who are trying to recall him". I ask them why they think Bloomberg just sent $350k to keep Morse in office, while the "out of state NRA extremists" have only spend a whopping $42k on the recall Why is Bloomberg spending so much money for some little recall election halfway across the country? What is really at stake here? Some people honestly think that bans on large sodas are not only a good thing, but also constitutional. Sometimes I feel like I don't want to live on this planet any more... [Shake]

I saw on Ch7 news this am where the NRA pumped a wad of cash to the recall efforts. I was gonna get pissed about biased media when the story came on and the gal also mentioned Bloomys $350K "gift" to their side as well.
Color me surprised.
I actually called their main switchboard and told the gal how refreshing it was to see both sides of a story relatively unbiased. I told her that we aren't stupid and know there are two sides to a story and how the Morse/Giron club is wrongly representing the reason for the recall. She had no idea what I meant and I explained it wasn't as much the finished product that has people so upset but the process involved. Ignored and belittled constituents don't far well.

Heard this morning on Peter Boyles show on 710 AM that a Los Angeles libturd millionaire has thrown $250K in addition to Bloomy's $350K to defeat the recall.

Boyles said the liberal $$ is being pushed here since a loss (i.e. successful recall) will severely hurt Bloomy's political future.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BPTactical

I saw on Ch7 news this am where the NRA pumped a wad of cash to the recall efforts. I was gonna get pissed about biased media when the story came on and the gal also mentioned Bloomys $350K "gift" to their side as well.
Color me surprised.

---

I've been watching the early morning news on 7 for a few months now after Fox 31 revealed their true colors. I've been pretty happy about their delivery of the news. Mostly just the facts without the leftist editorial comments. I also caught the piece on the NRA contribution and thought it was well balanced and to the point.

All this funneling of $$$ just proves what some have been saying all along: CO is the new 'proving ground'! HELLO! America? Are you watching? This show will be coming to your state next.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brutal

Visiting the family in Wisconsin over the long weekend, and while they're all Repubs or flipped repub after Obama's mess (or not admitting otherwise), my brother says, "sensible limits.." and "if you need more than 15 rounds..." I told him first what a stupid fucktard he was, that it was not about hunting, and asked him how my wife could conceivably defend herself against multiple attackers with "only" 15 rounds in her AR-15? I also asked him how many criminals he thought would obey the "sensible" gun laws. He changed the subject like the cowardly half-entitled tit sucker he is. Sad to even think he was once a Marine.

---

Right on brother. Wish I could've been there for that conversation. One of the points I like to make when a Libtard starts in with the whole "sensible gun laws" BS is asking them if they know which magazines LE have for their firearms. I then follow it up with, why should I be less-equipped to protect my family? Their family is just important as mine and why should I be restricted when they're not?