Warrenty return issues on gun/mags over 15 rounds?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mtnrider

I just went back and did it again with a little more tape. I let it cool for a while the first time but after a couple of hours one of the mags was sticking (slightly) again. Going to let it sit over night this time. I might not be boiling it long enough but I am a bit paranoid of damaging something .
I wonder what would be better, to heat and then cool naturally or heat and put in cold water to cool quickly? Any one now what would be best for a material like this to hold its shape?

---

I would think that cooling it quickly would make it brittle .......... or maybe that is only metals..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mtnrider

I just went back and did it again with a little more tape. I let it cool for a while the first time but after a couple of hours one of the mags was sticking (slightly) again. Going to let it sit over night this time. I might not be boiling it long enough but I am a bit paranoid of damaging something .
I wonder what would be better, to heat and then cool naturally or heat and put in cold water to cool quickly? Any one now what would be best for a material like this to hold its shape?

---

I have some very thin SS shim sheet stock, like paper thin. if you want to use some as a backer for the mags pm me.

So how is a company from out of state not allowed to send a magazine in the state? Will Colorado authorities travel to the state where the mags came from and press charges? Wouldn't it be all on whoever accepts the mags within the state? Seems dumb for a company to refuse unless I am missing something.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KAPA

So how is a company from out of state not allowed to send a magazine in the state? Will Colorado authorities travel to the state where the mags came from and press charges? Wouldn't it be all on whoever accepts the mags within the state? Seems dumb for a company to refuse unless I am missing something.

---

Yes, Colorado would indict the company's officials in Colorado. Then Colorado would extradite those officials from their state and that state would as a regular course of business go arrest those officials and put them on a plane to Colorado. Why do you think it would happen any other way?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KAPA

So how is a company from out of state not allowed to send a magazine in the state? Will Colorado authorities travel to the state where the mags came from and press charges? Wouldn't it be all on whoever accepts the mags within the state? Seems dumb for a company to refuse unless I am missing something.

---

The vendors have put CO. on their do not call list. Just as CA , NY, NO, DR MA and cities like Chicago.
Why risk a major lawsuit, if not indictments, for sales of items, prohibited by law.

Well my excitement was short lived. After the gun sitting overnight it went back to it's original form. It's better then before but not all mags are dropping freely now :-(.
Looks like I am Going to have to figure out how to get them exchanged.

I didn't read the rest of the thread but I would NOT send your mags anywhere.

I can't find the article but I did hear from a good source at a local police department in CO that a person was placed on a 72 hour mental health hold. They're guns were taken for safe keeping at the request of the gun owners. Once the person was released from the mental health hold the police department returned all the firearms to the owner. A anti-gun group is attempting to take suit against the pd because they do a background check to return the guns to the owner and they returned the magazines to the owner which in some cases were able to hold more than 15 rounds.

I am still searching for it and I know the person that told me this would not lie about it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KevDen2005

I didn't read the rest of the thread but I would NOT send your mags anywhere.

I can't find the article but I did hear from a good source at a local police department in CO that a person was placed on a 72 hour mental health hold. They're guns were taken for safe keeping at the request of the gun owners. Once the person was released from the mental health hold the police department returned all the firearms to the owner. A anti-gun group is attempting to take suit against the pd because they do a background check to return the guns to the owner and they returned the magazines to the owner which in some cases were able to hold more than 15 rounds.

I am still searching for it and I know the person that told me this would not lie about it.

---

You should probably read the whole post because I have no clue what your talking about or the relevance to what I am dealing with?

.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mtnrider

You should probably read the whole post because I have no clue what your talking about or the relevance to what I am dealing with?

.

---

My point was that a PD is possibly in violation of the law when returning the property to its rightful owner when the magazines capacity is above 15 rounds. So I wouldn't attempt to exchange or send your mags anywhere.

Based on your first post about the 17 round mags, I didn't read the whole thread.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KevDen2005

My point was that a PD is possibly in violation of the law when returning the property to its rightful owner when the magazines capacity is above 15 rounds. So I wouldn't attempt to exchange or send your mags anywhere.

---

I see where you are going now. S&W already said they would not return my mags if I sent them so it's not a option right now from Colorado.