A step back towards private property rights

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by merl

We get it, you hate bicycles, they hate you too. They cycle of being dicks to each other has gone on long enough that both sides hate each other completely.

What exactly would bicycle registration achieve, other than as a punitive move? Based on mass (many registrations are based on vehicle mass since that is what damages roads) the fee would miniscule until you start tacking on the administrative costs.

Edit: damn it now I'm sucked into another one of these.

---

I like bicycles, I just hate the spandex wearing queer baits that think they own a highway or roadway and cause serious hazards to themselves and motorists who subsidize their ability to ride on nice pavement.
Registration, along with new CRS additions would achieve safer roadways, equality among those who utilize our road system since it is essentially based on a user fee system, requirements for bicyclists to carry a registration as well as a drivers license or a bicycle license if they choose not to have a drivers license. This will make it much easier for LEO to issue citations for not obeying CRS.
As to registrations, most are based on vehicle age, in addition to fees, taxes, administrative costs, etc. This move would give bicyclists a right to the road, as well as laws they would have to abide by which would include a bicyclist test to make sure they are aware of such laws. This will of course include a trip to the infamous DMV to take a test to prove knowledge of the laws and physical ability to ride a bicycle on roadways that their registration would pay for. There would as well be a DMV fee, licensing fee, and renewal fee as well.

hopefully you also know it is currently in the CRS to honk behind a bicyclist while on a 2 lane road to alert the bicyclist that you are going to be passing them and you intend to give them the proper amount of space.


ETA: forgot to add, bicycles would be required to have a VIN number, which will help against theft, riding stolen bicycles, as well as verifying registration during a routine traffic stop. Of course each bicycle will be required to have a VIN, and each VIN bearing bicycle will be required to be registered in order to be ridden on roadways.

And the spandex wearing queer bates luv trees and hate guns.

http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?se...rbs&id=9459127

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sniper7

I like bicycles, I just hate the spandex wearing queer baits that think they own a highway or roadway and cause serious hazards to themselves and motorists who subsidize their ability to ride on nice pavement.
Registration, along with new CRS additions would achieve safer roadways, equality among those who utilize our road system since it is essentially based on a user fee system, requirements for bicyclists to carry a registration as well as a drivers license or a bicycle license if they choose not to have a drivers license. This will make it much easier for LEO to issue citations for not obeying CRS.
As to registrations, most are based on vehicle age, in addition to fees, taxes, administrative costs, etc. This move would give bicyclists a right to the road, as well as laws they would have to abide by which would include a bicyclist test to make sure they are aware of such laws. This will of course include a trip to the infamous DMV to take a test to prove knowledge of the laws and physical ability to ride a bicycle on roadways that their registration would pay for. There would as well be a DMV fee, licensing fee, and renewal fee as well.

hopefully you also know it is currently in the CRS to honk behind a bicyclist while on a 2 lane road to alert the bicyclist that you are going to be passing them and you intend to give them the proper amount of space.


ETA: forgot to add, bicycles would be required to have a VIN number, which will help against theft, riding stolen bicycles, as well as verifying registration during a routine traffic stop. Of course each bicycle will be required to have a VIN, and each VIN bearing bicycle will be required to be registered in order to be ridden on roadways.

---

I give this a big +1.

I rode a bicycle as main transportation for nearly 7 years. I had it registered(which only meant in case of theft it had an ID) every year. It was a small fee and I have no clue where the money went but it felt good to contribute. It did not mean I felt I had the right of way and all cars need to look out for me. That ends bad(seen it).

A dmv test/trip would be a bit much(think family who just rides around the greenbelt on occasion). $20or $40 a year, get a sticker and you can renew online or by phone.

Like I said I like the idea but I don't see it getting any traction. Guberment can hardly handle what they deal with now.

Btw: you would never catch me in spandex outfits even on 20mi joyrides. Bdu pants and a wife beater! 'Merica!

All sales tax from bikes and biking accessories should go to the highway trust fund, just like the sales tax for vehicle and auto accessories.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Eric P

All sales tax from bikes and biking accessories should go to the highway trust fund, just like the sales tax for vehicle and auto accessories.

---

What about mountain bikes? What about skate boards? What about roller blades?

Let's tax and legislate everything possible. Fun permits anyone? We should have to swipe a badge to go outside.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Irving

What about mountain bikes? What about skate boards? What about roller blades?

Let's tax and legislate everything possible. Fun permits anyone? We should have to swipe a badge to go outside.

---

Atvs and other off road vehicles which are not allowed to be on public roads can be registered with a small fee to colorado parks (oh sticker, snowmobile, dirt bike, boat). Mountain bikes can have this same exemption but will be subject to ticketing should they be ridden on public roads. ATVs and other off road vehicles that meet safety standards can be titled and driven on the roads, but will not require titles or registration if they only used off road (current regulations).
skateboards are not classified yet, but if they are used on roadways such as is seen on downhill riding in the mountains etc, they will be subject to registration as well. Exemptions will be made for them to utilize sidewalks and crosswalks such as walking and running pedestrians use. Roller blades are not an external accessory and are classified as rolling footwear. They will be treated the same as pedestrians and will be limited to sidewalks and crosswalks. Blading on public roadways will be subject to jaywalking citations.

this is just making it fair. My hunting dollars pay an extremely major portion of parks and recs activities thanks to that fuck head hickenlooper who combined the parks and rec and the Division of Wildlife. Parks was always in the red, DOW was always in the black and now my hunting dollars subsidize the parks and recs that were underfunded and overstaffed. Now the bicyclists don't get a free ride any more on the back of my tax dollars and on my roads that my registration pays for. I don't give a shit if they own a car or not, you play, you pay for each vehicle.

i would prefer a user based system and a complete overhaul, but that won't be happening so this will make a little equality on the roads both from a biker and driver standpoint, as well as making bicyclists responsible for knowing the laws (one of which will require minimum speeds on roadways, essentially keeping them off the highways and only on roads where speeds will be more in line with motor vehicle speeds), keeping up with registration, and subjecting them to known laws that they can be ticketed for by LEO.

I would also be overhauling the registration system while I was at it. No more bullshit paying E-470 fees in your registration is a hot item on my list. Total fucking bullshit.

and the licensing system would be on my list. No more of this lame ass drivers training that is done by folks who don't know how to drive. It would go toward a professional driving course which would unfortunately have some substantial costs associated with it. My drivers license test and motorcycle endorsement were a total joke. I think all of us can attest to that. The end result would be much more professional drivers, resulting in less traffic accidents and lowered death and injury rates.

My comment was in reference to the suggestion that ALL bicycle sales should go toward roads, not just road bike sales.

Orwell would be proud of the rest of your post though. :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sniper7

Atvs and other off road vehicles which are not allowed to be on public roads can be registered with a small fee to colorado parks (oh sticker, snowmobile, dirt bike, boat). Mountain bikes can have this same exemption but will be subject to ticketing should they be ridden on public roads. ATVs and other off road vehicles that meet safety standards can be titled and driven on the roads, but will not require titles or registration if they only used off road (current regulations).
skateboards are not classified yet, but if they are used on roadways such as is seen on downhill riding in the mountains etc, they will be subject to registration as well. Exemptions will be made for them to utilize sidewalks and crosswalks such as walking and running pedestrians use. Roller blades are not an external accessory and are classified as rolling footwear. They will be treated the same as pedestrians and will be limited to sidewalks and crosswalks. Blading on public roadways will be subject to jaywalking citations.

this is just making it fair. My hunting dollars pay an extremely major portion of parks and recs activities thanks to that fuck head hickenlooper who combined the parks and rec and the Division of Wildlife. Parks was always in the red, DOW was always in the black and now my hunting dollars subsidize the parks and recs that were underfunded and overstaffed. Now the bicyclists don't get a free ride any more on the back of my tax dollars and on my roads that my registration pays for. I don't give a shit if they own a car or not, you play, you pay for each vehicle.

i would prefer a user based system and a complete overhaul, but that won't be happening so this will make a little equality on the roads both from a biker and driver standpoint, as well as making bicyclists responsible for knowing the laws (one of which will require minimum speeds on roadways, essentially keeping them off the highways and only on roads where speeds will be more in line with motor vehicle speeds), keeping up with registration, and subjecting them to known laws that they can be ticketed for by LEO.

I would also be overhauling the registration system while I was at it. No more bullshit paying E-470 fees in your registration is a hot item on my list. Total fucking bullshit.

and the licensing system would be on my list. No more of this lame ass drivers training that is done by folks who don't know how to drive. It would go toward a professional driving course which would unfortunately have some substantial costs associated with it. My drivers license test and motorcycle endorsement were a total joke. I think all of us can attest to that. The end result would be much more professional drivers, resulting in less traffic accidents and lowered death and injury rates.

---

I would like to see a source of what you claim in bold. It was reported that both the Parks and Rec Dept and the DOW did not want to merge as they each thought the other would get their money. I always thought each were in the black every year.

I am not in favor of expanding government to register bicycles.

There are some of these properties in Colorado, saw a snip of it on the news the other night.