What's really telling in all of this is that we can't get a true conservative to make a good showing. Trump is no conservative.
Printable View
What's really telling in all of this is that we can't get a true conservative to make a good showing. Trump is no conservative.
Lets get to the "nut cutting". If you have a choice of Hillary, or Trump then what's your vote?
Hilary is more predictable than trump. Can you say Clinton legacy. I'll still vote for trump, but I'll hold my nose.
I have a prediction, and it's partly borrowed from Mr. Michael Brown of KHOW:
First, most polling data suggests that Cruz would beat Hillary. Hillary would beat Trump, and Bernie and Trump would be pretty close with Bernie edging Trump by a small margin. That's if the election were tomorrow. As far as the convention goes, I predict that one of two things may happen if Trump doesn't have the 1237 delegates required to secure the nomination after the first vote. 1) Trump doesn't finish the first vote with 1237, deals are made, Cruz wins in either the second or third round of voting after the delegates are released. Cruz goes on to secure the nomination, it's Cruz v. Hillary and Cruz wins (hopefully). 2) Trump doesn't get the 1237, Cruz wins in the second or third round, Trump gets pissed and pulls a Roosevelt (Theodore, not FDR), goes across the street and declares he's running on a 3rd Party Ticket, splits the R vote (like Roosevelt), Hillary becomes president, 4 more years of Obama-like policies.
I'm hoping for scenario #1...
I think either Ted or Hillary will end up being more of the same old crap. Slow steady decline. To me the difference between R and D is that one might give you the ol reach around when their tagging your rear. My dream ticket right now is Sanders V Trump. That way, no matter who wins, it will be all aboard the crazy bus to who knows where.
[panic]
I'll donate to his campaign as an independant!
I'm not with you here- The press is promoting Trump, because he's entertaining- Media is nothing more than infotainment, with some leftist indoctrination thrown in... they want, no NEED a candidate that will keep their ratings up- someone that will stir up shit and make people watch their channel to find out what THAT asshole did!
The media doesn't care about the country, they don't care about the people in it- they just want ratings because that makes them money... they won't help promote a boring candidate who's good for the country, because good stability is bad for their ratings.
Michael Brown can eat a bag of Mark Levins. Their incestuous relationships with the Cruz's/Bush's is sickeningly obvious.
Cruz met his Goldman Sachs wife while they were both working on the Bush campaign.
Brown was FEMA Director appointed by Bush.
Levin is engaged to a woman who's son is currently working o̶n̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶C̶r̶u̶z̶ ̶c̶a̶m̶p̶a̶i̶g̶n̶. in the Cruz Senate office. (ETA correction)
Sickening.
No way in hell Hillary (if she's still free) beats anyone in the general election - unless the vote is split because the RNC robs Trump of the nomination - then all hell will break loose.
Worst denial ever:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QW2B7Ky-0dk
Why is that? What makes it a bad denial? How on earth do you give any credibility whatsoever to a rumor story from the national enquirer? It certainly smells of the man with the little hands...
we'll see