This is about control not guns.
Can you imagine if they said you can't have books or magazines with too many pages or because they look scary just based on the cover.
Printable View
This is about control not guns.
Can you imagine if they said you can't have books or magazines with too many pages or because they look scary just based on the cover.
BOOKS ? no one reads anymore, that's so 20th century. Hell people are too mesmerized by their cell to look up when crossing a street.Quote:
Originally Posted by DOC
No one but the police and military should have books. Politicians were elected to lead not to read.
“A book is a loaded gun in the house next door...Who knows who might be the target of the well-read man?”
― Ray Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451
There is a book set in alternative history where video and the internet come out before novels. Novels become popular and all the adults freak out over kids "reading" these stories with a pre-determined story.
The courts are making a great case for limiting the power of the Judiciary branch.
Attachment 69338
They will scream and whine but they have done this to themselves...
Uh...guys? I saw this today. Hmmmm. Anyone else hear about this?
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/20...itia-purposes/
The opinions I've read seem to suggest it won't be worth much but could cost states/cities more trying to defend their bans.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonsey
The idea of our RKBA being fungible and not entitled to strict Constitutional scrutiny but upheld by the whim of an EO is laughable. The Founders must getting quite an ab workout rolling in their graves.
I have seen it. But I was to see it put into action. There is a great case to throw a certain career communist in jail for 20 years and they are not acting on it. So seeing it in action is believing it.
An EO is weak sauce. It can be undone as easily as it was done.
We need some strongly worded supreme court rulings. That's the only thing that will change what's happening at every level of government.
O2