It was fun while it lasted - EU to destroy Internet

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by asmo

"The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it". -- John Gilmore 1993

---

We sure were innocent and starry-eyed back then, weren't we?

Where there's a will, there's ways to get around it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 68Charger

Whatever, I doubt it will amount to much since the EU doesn't have the balls to kick refugees out from their own countries after beating and raping women there.

---

No, they choose not to go after refugee criminals because refugees have more societal value than citizens / indigenous people. Refugees don't really make memes, so they'll put the full force of law behind prosecuting that.

Another piece of GDPR garbage.

We're all fucked with this EU BS. Anyone and everyone is a target for litigation through non-compliance of EU regs.

I'm getting queries from some (less sophisticated) clients because IBM is sending out letters demanding they acknowledge they do business with IBM, which is bound by GDPR due to business conducted within the EU. It's guilt by association. I'm talking mom and pop machine shops that only make, market, and sell domestically. Just because they use Big Blue iron, they're subject to this crap.

I don't profess to understand it all, but the EU can go fuck themselves with an ebola infected cactus.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brutal

Another piece of GDPR garbage.

We're all fucked with this EU BS. Anyone and everyone is a target for litigation through non-compliance of EU regs.

I'm getting queries from some (less sophisticated) clients because IBM is sending out letters demanding they acknowledge they do business with IBM, which is bound by GDPR due to business conducted within the EU. It's guilt by association. I'm talking mom and pop machine shops that only make, market, and sell domestically. Just because they use Big Blue iron, they're subject to this crap.

I don't profess to understand it all, but the EU can go fuck themselves with an ebola infected cactus.

---

Just figured I'd add my .02 here - Completely agree as to the fucked-up way that law was written and all the BS unintended consequences cropping up...

That said, there was/is valid underlying reasoning (the intent was solid, but end result got fucked up), and this is ultimately the result of shitbags in expensive suits that won't act properly unless beaten into submission, which is the intent of those 4% Gross Revenue fines for non-compliance...

Expect way more of this coming down at the fed/state level because as previously stated, there is a real need (CA just passed a similar privacy law, and while as usual they let special interests fuck it up, they actually came close to doing something right for a change...), but I'm still not holding my breath for the personal accountabity (civil & criminal) which is really required to solve the underlying problem(s) that law was meant to address..

Can anyone take the time to unpack this and explain what it means to the lay person? Or have a link to an article or something?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Irving

Can anyone take the time to unpack this and explain what it means to the lay person? Or have a link to an article or something?

---

The EU has sway over domestic items.

novus ordo seclorum

Well good news for now, some UKIP MEPs were able to get the thing dragged out of secret and to a vote to put it off for further debate and amendments (which may kill it). So this gives them until September to mobilize opposition to it (which had grown pretty strong in the last few days anyway).

Or in other words, they've given Italy, Hungary, Poland and Romania more time to destroy the entire EU before it comes up for a vote again.