you guys need to cut this anti cop spew.
if you have nothing to hide you should welcome them in and thank them for their service.
and if you don't want them in your home then, well... you must have something to hide.
Printable View
you guys need to cut this anti cop spew.
if you have nothing to hide you should welcome them in and thank them for their service.
and if you don't want them in your home then, well... you must have something to hide.
Scary.
I guess I better join the force so I can feel free/safe in my own home...
No way this makes it past the Federal Court of Appeals. There is far too much case law precedent going the other way.
Bad law from the bench. I still have faith that with time these two rulings will be overturned. No one, not even learned judges are perfect. These rulings are obvious examples.
It is a very disturbing ruling. I might understand what one poster said about the "hot pursuit" or something in action but a blanket anytime/no reason?
Now I am not an overly learned man but even I can understand this:
Quote:
Information Maintained by the Office of Code Revision Indiana Legislative Services Agency
PREAMBLE.
TO THE END, that justice be established, public order maintained, and liberty perpetuated; WE, the People of the State of Indiana, grateful to ALMIGHTY GOD for the free exercise of the right to choose our own form of government, do ordain this Constitution.
ARTICLE 1.
Bill of Rights.
Section 11. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable search or seizure, shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person or thing to be seized.