Feinstein Ban - Early report

[Shake] [Shake]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BPTactical

ANY elected official who supports this legislation is WILLFULLY violating their Oath of Office.

---

AMEN!!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aloha_Shooter

Yes, any gun with a DETACHABLE magazine can be fitted with a magazine that holds more rounds. The antis don't want you to have any guns anyway and would prefer you only have one shot if they have to allow you to have a gun at all so they don't see any contradiction.

---

So this banning everything but black-powder, revolvers, breach loading guns, and guns with a mag tube that can't be modified to hold more than 5.
Shouldn't the list of proposed guns be much longer?

It looks as if she threw everything including the kitchen sink in this bill. I wonder if it's like network TV: throw shit on the wall and see what sticks.

BTW: Screw that noise!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dingo

^^^^THIS^^^^ I'm not military, but I would trust any Marine I know with a so-called "assault weapon" a thousand times more than some of these wanna-be-cowboy LEO's I've met. (Not a blanket statement - just referring to the unfortunate impression I've formed from talking with most Denver/Boulder cops.)

---

You are missing their point.
ALL military are more likely then not mentally ill (why would they join up anyway) so they are in eligible...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ronin13

I've been mulling this over for a few weeks now, figure this is as good of place to say it... I see all the "special treatment" for LEOs getting to keep guns and not being affected by any legislation. What about veterans? We're the ones who actually train, employ, and constantly use these "assault weapons"- yet I have yet to hear any lawmaker address this. Not saying if any law is passed they should include exemptions for LE and mil vets and eff everyone else, just asking why they are going to exclude active and retired LE but not active/retired (honorable) mil as well? I would think a discharged Marine is better equipped to safely possess and own an AR-15 than a retired Mesa County Sheriff's Deputy.

But still, Feinstein needs to be arrested and charged with treason. I won't hold my breath, but that's the law...

---

Because dems don't trust honorably discharged veterans. Recall the homeland security memos from a couple of years ago identifying high risk groups for domestic terrorism - returning veterans, preppers owning more than a 7 day supply of food,...?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lowbeyond

i aint complying with shit

---

Repost!!! [ROFL2][LOL]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by loveski

Good thing I have a strong right hand. Time to write more letters. Everyone needs to contact their reps and senators again

---

Yeap, I've just drafted a new one, a little lenghty but I think it gets the point across. Tell me what you guys think of it.

Quote:

---

Dear Representative/Senator:

I will start this letter with a simple question. How will you vote?

With today’s introduction of Senator Feinstein’s “Assault Weapon Ban” bill in the Senate, I’ve been compelled to again write and express my deep concern for the future of our constitutional republic. Yes I said constitutional republic, the United States of America is not and never has been, a democracy. I do not state that as an insult to your intelligence but I find it necessary to remind everyone of that every now and then, especially when usurpations of the constitution are being considered with any seriousness.

The Constitution of the United States of America is the document that controls what the federal government can and cannot do, and how they are to do it. Yet again another legislator has proposed ignoring it and further degrading its principles. Senator Feinstein by introducing this bill has willfully disregarded her oath of office yet again. Not that this is some earth shattering revelation, and it’s obviously not the first time it’s happened nor will it be the last. However it is a very disturbing trend that is ever increasing in frequency.

I write to remind you of the oath you took to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America. Not inpart, but in its entirety. The world is watching what our elected representatives do in times like these and it is no time to back down and compromise on the Constitution. I suggest that if Senator Feinstein wishes to circumvent the 2^nd Amendment that she at least has the courage to go about it in the proper way and propose a constitutional amendment. That is not to say that I would support such an endeavor, but she would at least have my respect for doing it the right way. She contends that she has the backing of “the people” and that 2^nd Amendment supporters are the few or the fringe of this country. Well I challenge her to prove it, go about the amendment process and whatever comes of it, comes.

I could go on with lengthy explanations citing historical documents like the Militia Act, and the Constitution, but it’s a waste of my time and yours as you both know and understand them or you do not, and my explanation will most likely make no difference. So I won’t do that. What I will do is pose the question one more time, but please know this before you answer. I will make my decision on how to proceed from here based solely on your answer. This includes how I will vote in coming elections but does not even begin to encompass what I will do. Please know that anyone who votes for Senator Feinstein’s bill should it make it before your legislative body in ANY form will become the focus of my efforts. These efforts will begin with but not be limited to:

• Voting
• Supporting opposing candidates in election efforts.
• Actively campaigning for or against candidates
• Financial donations to campaign efforts

I don’t need a lengthy explanation of your position for your vote all I need is a one word answer, Yes or No, that is all I need to know. So here it is again.

If/when Senator Feinstein’s “Assault Weapons Ban” bill comes before you , How will you vote?

Sincerely,

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Singlestack

Because dems don't trust honorably discharged veterans. Recall the homeland security memos from a couple of years ago identifying high risk groups for domestic terrorism - returning veterans, preppers owning more than a 7 day supply of food,...?

---

Ooops. my fault. I completely forgot about that, and I'm using that silly logic again! Please don't tell Jim! [Coffee]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XC700116

Yeap, I've just drafted a new one, a little lenghty but I think it gets the point across. Tell me what you guys think of it.

---

You were at the Rally last weekend, weren't you? Holbert's advice was good! [Beer]

She knows that bill is DOA when it gets to the House. Pure grandstanding on her pet issue. It's the "compromise" bill that has me worried.