He is testifying for background checks but the shooter of his wife passed a background check.
Printable View
He is testifying for background checks but the shooter of his wife passed a background check.
Sounds like AZ needed to get their shit together and they would of stopped the guy from buying a gun. Oh and I thought it was a 3 minute time limit?
He just said "80% of Coloradans support universal background checks." Did anyone ask you Coloradans? They sure as hell didn't ask me. I guess "gun-owning Coloradans" don't count.
His logic is so fouled that it's difficult to listen to
82% of Colorado wants checks on all gun transactions? Where did he get those numbers?
I suppose it would be bad form for one of the senators to ask him "Where in Colorado do you live"?
"I'm supporting this bill that wouldn't have done shit to prevent my wife from being shot."
Let's play the maybe game.
Senator called him out on the Giffords shooter passing a BGC. Kelly responds that yes, he passed it, but if he hadn't he had the option to go buy a gun from a gun show or an internet private sale without having to do a background check. NOT IN COLORADO, IDIOT.
Kelly just stated openly that he has NO EXPERTISE ON THE COLORADO BILL.
What the fuck? Why is he testifying then?
So he isn't an expert on the bill why is he here then?