Originally Posted by
foxtrot
Question: Remember when Cigarrettes were legal to smoke (as they still are) AND were promoted as being HEALTHY, Akin to Vitamins and/or medicine, the cure to all sorts of ailments, the "cool" thing to do, and you were an outcast if you didn't smoke.....
Did that lead to lower rates of teens smoking in the 40's and 50's?
Yeah, it all sounds familiar doesn't it.
"Science" has become a bent-barreled hi point in the hands of a circus monkey. Bias will always prevail.
If weed were treated like Tabacco and generally disdained in society, dating pools, and presumed to be unhealthy; then yes, you would see lower utilization. With all the propaganda distributed, there is little reason for teens not to start smoking weed in Colorado - 1940's revisited. If they don't become a stoner, they will be in pain and depressed after all, and have no friends being such a prude.
There is nothing new in annuls of time, just the same old shit with a different label.