Exactly.
Printable View
Haven't seen the ol' hammer come down in a while.
In case some missed the ruling and it wasn't clarified in this thread, here's the crib notes.
It's a one time ruling based on state law as it existed at the time
It was / is a case where the "couple" shopped for a baker they could challenge.
It was also a decision based on the CO Civil rights commission's blatant discriminatory actions towards the baker.
Hahaha, setting aside the seriousness of this case - so much this. And it was one of my first thoughts years ago when this all started brewing.
Personally, I’m extremely polite to waiters, servers, and such so I don’t get a spit special!
Double Bac-o cheese, anyone? Large Farva?
There was a pattern of attacking religion in her posts that I noticed. I am master of the obvious, so I was likely not alone.
I doubt they ever had any intention of eating the cake... this was never about cake.
Would seem like that door is open... when 7 supreme court justices say you were discriminated against.
Freedom of speech should include the right to NOT say something you don't want to.