They have no idea what "by any means necessary" actually means.
Printable View
They have no idea what "by any means necessary" actually means.
I suggest they ask wikipedia.
Like to see some SJW come knocking on my door. CANDYGRAM FOR MONGO .
Hell get a bunch of folks to wear 1930's clothing & blackface. Throwing down some Al Jolsen routine . Them shitheads be so APPALLED and.... IN (sniff) TEARS they'd get run over by their own white guilt. Frozen in place like deer in the headlights.
Not discounting there's a good portion who could carry their weight. But that would mean they'd have to use the same tools they demonize so much. OH THE HORROR.
Don't remember a word about guns after Paris, it was terrorists from the first second.
Obama came forward after Paris attacks started concerned for the people, here he just cared about the guns.
There were a lot of tools used to pull this attack off. It wouldn't have happened without Internet, cell phones, a vehicle, a plane to get his woman, and guns... eliminate any one of those things but the guns from the equation and this would not have happened. The guns could have been replaced with bombs, chemicals, etc.......
Saw this little gem this morning, wow, the media truly is moronic. If you can't report accurately or factually after doing your homework, how can I be expected to believe a single word you say?
http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/12...91d6c6b6f4.jpg
Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
.22 mm= ~.009 inch. Is that legal for hunting terrorists in this state?
They must be the evil multi automatic Flechette rounds.
Between this and the New Yorker cover (I won't post it but you can find if you haven't seen it) I think the Left is transitioning from trying to maintain the perception of a war against inanimate objects (guns) to admitting it is a war against people. People they hate more than known and stated enemies with whom they will ally for their common goal; attacking Conservatives.
In this moment the Left becomes the very tyranny mentioned by our Founders.
I won't forget this piece or the New Yorker cover. I think it speaks volumes of our intellectual and moral superiors who live in the big cities. We've always had our differences but I think the chasm is now too wide to mend.