Printable View
Remember the definition of insanity, doing the same thing over and expecting different results. We have been increasing the money given to schools over and over and getting worse and worse results from our schools. Why would I give them even more? No on both.
+1Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Lebowski
The problem is the districts spend the money in the worst places. I know of a few districts that have more a lot administrators now then they did 10 years ago but now have less kids. If they would be less top heavy and focus the money where it needs to be it might be a different story. That said 66 is a piece of shit and would hurt more schools then it would help. What else would you expect from the current crop of retards in office.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dalendenver
They had the Jeff Co conservative school board candidate on Rosin this week. One said they have 1 administrator for every 7 kids. That seems awfully excessive. That means there are 2-3 times the number of administrators as teachers. Cut the admin to less than 1 per 20 teachers and see how much more funding can be had without raising taxes. Drop the multi-culturalism and social promotion and get back to the core basics prior to high school.
Where are the anti66 ads? I see and hear the pro 66 ads all over.
All the money is with the pro 66 side (unions, Demonrats and other big government types that benefit personally from higher taxes) ... hell I tried to get a freakin' yard sign from one of the anti 66 groups and was told I could have one but I'd have to drive to Denver to get it so my guess is there's not going to be any yardsigns outside of the DMA.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric P
Even so I expect it to fail.
I wouldn't bet on it failing. Denver and leftie population centers have a lot more influence. Rural poor districts would benefit greatly with minimal cost to thier voters.