And this today from Patriot Update, on the comment by Clinton to Jeb Bush, about "taking care of Trump": http://patriotupdate.com/bill-clinto...uring-debates/
Printable View
And this today from Patriot Update, on the comment by Clinton to Jeb Bush, about "taking care of Trump": http://patriotupdate.com/bill-clinto...uring-debates/
Wow, and I thought Obamabots didn't make sense. Seriously, where did this "leak" of Clinton supposedly reassuring Jeb Bush come from? Why in God's name does anyone think Bush would be consulting with Clinton? Sorry, Clinton/Trump collusion is far FAR more likely than Clinton/Bush cooperation or consultation. Trump has decades of history of supporting the Clintons and vice-versa.Quote:
Originally Posted by sellersm
This is how I feel about debates. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...258_story.html
Quote:
Wednesday night. Romney vs. Obama. Live. The 28th episode in America’s long-running television series — the presidential debates — in which two men go on stage and face off without scripts or teleprompters, and with the ever-present possibility of getting trounced or humiliated. In presidential politics, a debate — a real debate — is a test like no other.That’s why none of us has ever seen one. A true debate is just too risky. From 1960 onward, the events called presidential debates have delivered not clashes of of rhetorical greatness but the spectacle of two people engaged in dueling job interviews. These interviews unfold side by side in front of the same human resources representative, and the skill needed to land the position is much like the one eighth-graders rely on to win spelling bees: the ability to memorize the answers to the questions ahead of time, then repeat them, precisely as learned. Debates? Modern politicians don’t partake in debates. Not real ones.
Sounds about right.