Sun is at about 10 o'clock. Lighting on the antlers is the same as the trees. I don't see shading issues at all.
This picture on the other hand....
http://ursispaltenstein.ch/blog/imag...gest_moose.jpg
Printable View
Sun is at about 10 o'clock. Lighting on the antlers is the same as the trees. I don't see shading issues at all.
This picture on the other hand....
http://ursispaltenstein.ch/blog/imag...gest_moose.jpg
Looks to me like they can get pretty fawkin' big. But this is probably photoshopped too.....
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b1...ff/moose01.jpg
Alaska moose.. that is real.
it looks pretty good except where his foot is on the road in the second picture. looks like a really stark contrast in color and shape, which is possible but makes me a little suspect.
I don't see the problem with the foot on the road, but then I know jack sh-- about photography. Hell can't even take a good pic of my guns. But when I went back & looked, the beams of light on his front legs did seem to be consistent with location of the sun and was also consistent with the beams of light on the road. Does the position of the camera also play a role? Again, I can snap a pic, but ain't no telling what it will look like.
I'm pretty sure that's Bullwinkle.
Bingo! That's something we can all agree with.Quote:
Originally Posted by ray1970
Where's Rocky in the photos?
I think I see a sinister looking little Russian dude hiding in the bushes.....
I think it's real.
Several years ago I did a Yukon moose hunt and was lucky enough to get a big one. 65+" spread on the antlers. I ended up with 660# of BONELESS meat so figure the thing on the hoof weighed very near a ton.