Printable View
Yeah but I doubt that a conservative would have enough of a problem with me to abuse it against me. I imagine a decent percent of liberals would want to disarm me as soon as they found out I'm an NRA/GOA/SAF member.Quote:
Originally Posted by Irving
Besides, most liberals don't own guns, or if they do, don't see them as important. So what would be the point of slapping them with an ex parte gun grab order?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irving
Quote:
Originally Posted by CavSct1983
I didn't find anything pertaining to the rights of the TRO/PRO filer which leads me to believe they can buy and possess firearms. The recipient of the TRO/PRO cannot possess firearms but that is normal in a DV case. A DV judgement will result in the defendent being prohibited from buying and posessing firearms, in CO I think it is a lifetime ban.Quote:
Originally Posted by Irving
https://www.courts.state.co.us/userf...FAQs%20%20.pdf
I imagine you'd be incorrect to assume that a significant amount of liberals would want you disarmed just because they found out that you have a gun. Also, I agree that it'd be easiest to use this law against someone who owns guns, and more likely than not people who actually have guns would be the ones to know about the law in the first place.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rumline
As to the TRO, I hope that I'm wrong, I always thought that was stupid.
If there's a TRO you put out. When a 4473 bgc is called in it doesn't show who pulled it and or it's against. Just that your name is on it, making you contact in writing CBI for clarification for that or next purchase.
I know what you mean about morals. My family is "Christian" but some of uncles fucked my father over on work at least twice that I know of, they were "COSO", Christian on Sunday Only. They are all dead now so it doesn't matter that I write this.Quote:
Originally Posted by Irving
Voting record, how can I tie that to morals. That is pretty difficult since there are members of all parties that are adulterers or thieves or liars, just that in my experience these people are in the (R) but they don't dominate the (R) like they do the (D).
Of course nowadays the lines are really blurred since the (R) are socialists and the (D) are communists.
I think that it is disingenuous to assume that the majority of the people in the party that you're not in are morally corrupt. It's easy to lap up our own propaganda that people who don't feel the same on most issues are just mentally defective, but if that were anywhere near the truth, we wouldn't have survived as a species long enough to get where we are today.
I am biased towards my team but I'm not disingenuous in the case of communism, communism has 100 years of amoral corruption and murder to back up my statement and the (D) party has embraced a very large part of that amoral corruption.Quote:
Originally Posted by Irving
Yep, Communism and Marxism are terrible. Great way to convince people that they are marginalized and they better do something about it so that they'll even have a chance in this world. The thing is, it's used today in this country on dumb students who haven't even entered the world and had the chance to become a failure yet. They are so scared they yell about changing the world before they even enter it. We've seen that more and more as college enrollment increases.
Crap like this makes me feel like we have completely lost are once great state of Colorado. The fact that people can't see just how ignorant this idea of giving so much power to every single individual without any checks or balances boggles my mind. Is like taking advise from kids who eat tide pods.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk