Elon Musk buying Twitter

It might be a really good investment to buy a information platform to gather business intelligence and influence people to a positive outcome. Having a social media platform, a space based internet provider, electric transportation company and a space launch platform could be really good for his bottom line.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sX1Y2JMK6g8

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Great-Kazoo

42, the answer's 42.



ignore everything else you've been told.

---

Writing this down.....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FoxtArt

It is quite possible to travel C+ in relation to earth without breaking any physics at all.

Consider this: In the early days of the universe it expanded faster than light speed by many orders of magnitude.

That's because spacetime (and the expansion thereof) is independent to C. By working with spacetime instead of "throwing shit out the back (rocket engines), e.g. compressing spacetime in one direction and expanding it in another, you can transit distance without the problem of time dilation as well, and exceed C to an award observer without actually moving much at all.

And there's evidence of it on earth. Impressive sensory data collected by US, and confirmed by the US Gov to exhibit methods of propulsion that are impossible under standard physics.


June 2021 ODNP report of the US Gov.

Note that the encounters were repeatedly witnessed by dozens of airmen and sailors across multiple carrier groups over the last 18 years, and visual, video, and sensor data all correlated. There are two main ways this kind of flight is possible: 1) Spacetime manipulation or 2) Magic is real, and Gandalf is trying to get a ring to Hawaii.

No suggested conclusion as to what they are, but I think it's silly to say we don't know they are something, that utilizes physics outside of our kinetics.

---

No. The speed of light is a defined limit in your locality. You can have a velocity > c relative to a receding reference frame (e.g, 2 points in space-time each traveling 0.75c in their own reference frames will have a relative velocity of 1.5c * cos (angle between their respective velocity vectors) but there is nothing in known physics that allows anything to travel faster than light in the local reference frame. That doesn't mean it's impossible but it does mean it requires new physics.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aloha_Shooter

No. The speed of light is a defined limit in your locality. You can have a velocity > c relative to a receding reference frame (e.g, 2 points in space-time each traveling 0.75c in their own reference frames will have a relative velocity of 1.5c * cos (angle between their respective velocity vectors) but there is nothing in known physics that allows anything to travel faster than light in the local reference frame. That doesn't mean it's impossible but it does mean it requires new physics.

---

Once again, even our understanding of physics permit the apparent violation of C it exclusively when you are dealing with spacetime compression/expansion. The early universe inflated well in excess of C in relation to a fixed reference point. So in other words, if we imagine two fixed, imaginary objects in the early universe, they were spreading apart faster than even C - often by large margins. But, all the while, they were not breaking light speed. It is important to understand that the distances between objects can be changed/dilated/expanded in spacetime which does not run afoul of the constant itself. It is akin to saying we can get from NYC to India in six hours. Not by incredible speed, but instead by shortening the distance by going through the earth. Likewise if the earth is inflating, the distances between us and India increase. If the earth inflates fast enough, that distance increases faster than light speed, but neither India or NYC has moved. This is also how something can make impossible movements (right angle turns for instance) without destructing. If you aren't moving through spacetime, but instead moving spacetime, your movement is minimal while your apparent movement is substantial.

These physics are well understood by scientists on earth. And there is some progress towards the theoretical warp bubbles here (spacetime manipulation like I described), they are just, so far, on a microscopic level. So we do understand it, it is not currently possible for us purely from a technological perspective. If we don't wipe ourselves out, there is a 99% chance it will be, someday.

WTF does this have to do with Elon and Twitter again?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 00tec

WTF does this have to do with Elon and Twitter again?

---

Elon to spaceX to long distance space travel to speed limitations to physics discussion.

Pretty conventional sidetrack.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 00tec

WTF does this have to do with Elon and Twitter again?

---

Word.

He should buy Facebook too and clean THAT shithole up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 00tec

WTF does this have to do with Elon and Twitter again?

---

Twitter is a big rabbit hole

Just proved by this trip chasing the rabbit

https://i.imgur.com/ldqMz6h.jpg

This article is claiming Starlink is keeping Ukraine connected despite Russian attempts to jam the satellites. It is my understanding that the board of directors of Twitter does not want Mr. Musk airing the dirty laundry of its past actions. Unfair censorship tactics per se.


https://news.yahoo.com/spacex-shut-d...190254556.html