Jamie Oliver is a big proponent of cooking healthy in schools.
His point is that this is a life skill, something to be taught and learned.
It's not about free meals. It's not about less expensive meals. It's about meals done right.
-John
Printable View
Jamie Oliver is a big proponent of cooking healthy in schools.
His point is that this is a life skill, something to be taught and learned.
It's not about free meals. It's not about less expensive meals. It's about meals done right.
-John
It is about taxpayers supplying meals in public schools, not about learning how to cook.Quote:
Originally Posted by arbol
FF is about the state using a K-12 "meals program" to do another end run around TABOR and "tax the rich" to provide "equity." There's no accountability in this program.Quote:
Originally Posted by eddiememphis
Every time I read over the ballots I'm mailed I think to myself, "THESE are the most important topics that need to be brought to the voters? Really?!"
Mostly bread and circuses I believe.Quote:
Originally Posted by kidicarus13
A lot of them are things that the voters brought to themselves so to speak. That?s part of the reason you get such strange things on there. Otherwise when they don?t rename a tax to be a fee, then you can vote on that too.Quote:
Originally Posted by kidicarus13
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No on the lunches.
I am already paying for schools and welfare with no kids of my own.
I am paying for kids and didn't even get to fuck the mothers...[hahhah-no]
If vote no on FF twice if I could.
I ended up using The Independence Institute's Election guide.
https://i2i.org/guide-2022/
-John
ps. I think they recommended voting seven times (if you can) against FF.
I like Caldara and Kopel. Independence Institute tends to lean more libertarian and will be on the side of individual freedom.Quote:
Originally Posted by arbol
They say yes on 124 and 125. More liberty for consumers.
I disagree with them, not from the consumer point of view. I think those will change the small liquor store from owner run to corporate run. If they pass and I had a couple hundred million to invest in the retail liquor business, I would buy 50 or 100 corner shops, operate them at a corporate level and gain pricing and distribution advantages over Mom and Pop that are only allowed to own three currently.
The owners of the three stores I frequent say their beer sales have declined since the passage of the law allowing sales in grocery stores. Allowing wine in grocery stores would further cut into their sales. Less income for the owner would make him much more likely to sell to my company which would allow me to purchase more licenses.
It likely will lead to less small business and more low paying, low skill jobs.