Too bad one of the people in there didn't clear it and ventilate his ass
Printable View
I have a question. Official reports and such point to he was wearing a "tactical vest" which to me means a vest with lots of pouches for mags and such. No armor. But all the "chatter", especially the anti-CCW crap, says he was armored up and you couldn't shoot him.
Which is true as far as we can tell? Has any official sources referred to kevlar or plates? Or just tactical vest and such?
Here's a pic of what's being put out somewhere:
https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphot...56220965_n.jpg
No reference to armor, just tactical vest.
I'm really starting to think there was no armor at all.
Well they got the guns right lol. The mask was just a regular one, not some high speed version shown there.
To a news reporter, a 'tactical vest' is probably equivalent to 'ballistic armor'. You know, just like an FA AR is the same thing as a slingshot.
What a ridiculous mock-up. I seriously doubt he stormed in there looking like Judge Dredd, but this kind of shit is created for entertainment value, not journalism.
By the way, this whole thing reminded me of a pretty disturbing movie (can't remember the name, sorry) I caught on Netflix several months ago, where a pretty bright, but psychotic kid executes a well-planned scheme to dress in body armor, arm himself to the teeth, and massacre most of an entire town. If you find this movie, be warned you will be very pissed off when you get to the end of it. In light of the recent and very similar event so close to home, I don't think I could watch it again.
I haven't been following this much. But I think a good punishment would be burned alive on a stake with the 12 families shooting him with a .22...no headshots allowed. Payback is a bitch.