oh sure. I am with you. What could possibly go wrong if POTUS can just declare whatever he wants via EO. I mean think of all the money we could save by disbanding congress! Surely this is the way forwardQuote:
Originally Posted by Ghosty
Printable View
oh sure. I am with you. What could possibly go wrong if POTUS can just declare whatever he wants via EO. I mean think of all the money we could save by disbanding congress! Surely this is the way forwardQuote:
Originally Posted by Ghosty
Well - if you "doubt that very much that's all there is" then WHY IN THE WORLD can you "live with that"? The the camel's nose under the tent argument.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghosty
WTH is wrong with people not seeing this ?
Every one of you guys on this board that voted for the Kenyan Commie I will kick you in the n*ts when I get the chance. That's my first question to anyone I might sell a firearm to in the future. "Did you vote for Ovagina?" If so - then move on...
there are seriously people on the board here that voted for the O?
He has a bit of leeway on imported stuff since existing law has the 'sporting purpose' language in it. I don't see how he can make this apply to domestically produced items that aren't already specifically controlled. But then again I don't think he cares. Congress is in no shape to hold him to task on overstepping his authority and any legal challenges will be tied up in the courts for years. By the time it reaches SCOTUS he may have stacked it with judges sympathetic to him since one or more may retire by that time.Quote:
Originally Posted by kraven251
Some of the 2A's worst enemies are amongst us. On another firearms forum, a long standing member said he was ok with magazines being limited to 10rds. As I sold him most of my 1911 mags several months ago when I left the .45 world, I knew it was because he is personally not affected.
Each little corner of the gun world is only worried about themselves.
I don't shoot pheasant, I guess I should be OK with banning all shotguns made by Purdey, -it's not like it will affect me....
These types of 2A 'supporters' really get to me. One day they're going to find the legal limit on a magazine to be ZERO. And they'll only have themselves to blame.Quote:
Originally Posted by hatidua
Personally I don't have a need for a 100 round drum but it doesn't mean I won't fight tooth and nail for others to have the right to own and use them. The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
It sounds to "light" to me, I think they will go after the 30rdrs.. And i'm pretty sure some one will give them what they want and the media will cover it like they usually do and make us all look bad..
Great point. If he does do anything there is going to appeals and I'm sure it will be before the Supreme Court. The back log in filing paperwork to register every gun and mag will take years. Think how long it takes to process a silencer or go across state lines, currently? While it may take several months for the legal dust to settle, I'm still going to buy as much as I can, and support legal actions to reverse any of Obama's policies.Quote:
Originally Posted by kraven251
Nynco... and not positive, but pretty sure Rucker did too... [Shake]Quote:
Originally Posted by jreifsch80
BaileyGuns call this "oxymoron" (gun owners voting for a democrat). Read the 2012 Democratic Party Platform, they explicitly state "Gun Control" as one of their policies.
I know there are a couple here who voted for him the first time around. I'll forgive them for that as they probably got caught up in the "hope and change" hype. But anyone here who voted for him the second time around is an idiot.
Sent without the Tapatalk signature to appease Ah Pook.