Who do we like for SCOTUS?

More concern Thursday testimony won't happen. GOP appoints a sex crimes expert to do the interviewing of Ford. Ford team objects and I think this is their biggest issue. They want a name (supposedly female), resume, and an explanation of this person's role.

https://twitter.com/seungminkim/stat...84069226778624

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dn5lxZBW0AAiIM-.jpg:small

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dn5lxZhVsAAxJTA.jpg:small


I think they wanted the negative optics of old white men being insensitive towards Ford should any meaningful questions be asked. That way if Ford is further exposed as a liar, they can shift to feels.

Again, a truth teller doesn't pull this bullshit.

Well she's a liberal democrat. Therefore we already know she's not a "truth teller".

The really pathetic and sad thing:

A homeless crackhead facing indecent exposure charges would be treated more fairly than a highly qualified and respected justice being considered for the highest court in the nation.

Fucking sad

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BPTactical

The really pathetic and sad thing:

A homeless crackhead facing indecent exposure charges would be treated more fairly than a highly qualified and respected justice being considered for the highest court in the nation.

Fucking sad

---

How Fucking True



Oh Yeah in for the

[Alrigh]

The more they try this garbage the more certain I am that this is the person who needs to be in the position.

Welcome to Salem.

Remember that Andrew Breitbart was "red pilled" by watching the mistreatment of Clarence Thomas by the Democrats.

How many Andrew Breitbarts have they created in the last couple weeks?

McConnell says he has the votes. Then vote. Fuck the progressive scumbags.

So, this IS 4Chan we're talking about, so there's a decent chance it's not true. But it's still entertaining to think about what if it is! Scumbag lawyer Avenatti was recently saying how he had some slam dunk dirt on Kav, but he just locked his Twitter account.

Is this why?
Attachment 76187

Source: https://twitchy.com/sarahd-313035/20...itter-account/

Avenatti says he was too fragile to leave the account open...

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dn9kUMQXUAIdauH.jpg:small


We blew it up yesterday and he has nothing. He wants attention just like throughout all the Trump claims.

My guess is that he either did in fact get trolled or will go away after the vote.

Grassley has stopped tweeting about corn long enough to find he still has a pair.


https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/...88224529141761

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dn96Kc9VYAACcNk.jpg:small
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dn96LxrUcAAKf6v.jpg:small


Three important things in that letter...

- It's Thursday. No more delays
- He called out the Dims for withholding the info and then going public rather than to committee
- He touches on perjury, I think this is a strong hint that he wants to go back to counsel

Mitch either grew a pair or borrowed someone's. Whatever...good for him for telling DiFi to piss up a rope.

Committee vote schedule for Friday 9:30AM...

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dn-PJkAXkAA6Ib4.jpg:small


They are giving themselves all day Thursday to deal with Ford's theatrics, assuming she even shows.

Oh that's good. Republicans invoked the Biden Rule in 2016 to avoid voting on Garland. Here in 2018, they should invoke Biden Rule #2 - On FBI investigations in Supreme Court Nominations.
https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2018...orth-anything/

Hate to be Debbie Downer, but do we know that this Grassley letter is legit?

Sent from somewhere...

It's legit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bailey Guns

It's legit.

---

I wonder how much it even matters at this point?

From what I was reading, it seemed to be a moot point now due to an inability to fully complete the process prior to the beginning of the new term.

Is this another instance of R's appearing to step up but (intentionally) "just barely missing" the deadline? Hope that's not the case...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DireWolf

I wonder how much it even matters at this point?

From what I was reading, it seemed to be a moot point now due to an inability to fully complete the process prior to the beginning of the new term.

Is this another instance of R's appearing to step up but (intentionally) "just barely missing" the deadline? Hope that's not the case...

---

Not sure how this is playing out along the front range of CO. Down here disgusted and very openly vocal about it would be an understatement.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DireWolf

I wonder how much it even matters at this point?

From what I was reading, it seemed to be a moot point now due to an inability to fully complete the process prior to the beginning of the new term.

Is this another instance of R's appearing to step up but (intentionally) "just barely missing" the deadline? Hope that's not the case...

---

No, I don't think so. If Kavanaugh misses the first few cases he can still hear cases during the term. Unless I'm missing something, I think republican leadership handled this about as well as can be expected for the most part. I know, I know...it's really hard to believe.

http://scontent.fapa1-2.fna.fbcdn.ne...a1&oe=5C58FF83

Third accuser is on the record with a declaration from CreepyPornLawyer Michael Avenatti.

Read it very carefully to see how this game is being played.

All allegations made are vague. No locations but we get "approximately 1982." [LOL]

When she accuses Kavanaugh of a specific behavior, it then switches to "boys" in general. So K would get girls drunk so they could be raped and then "boys" would gang rape. She saw "boys" lined up to rape. K wouldn't take no for answer. For what? Touching without consent? Were they making out?

And the worst part: She saw all of this gang raping, said nothing, and then it was her turn. She claims K was there but wasn't he one who raped her. Nor did Judge.

This went on for two years according to accuser. Not a single parent, teacher, or LEO was told about all this raping. Young women (not clear if she was of age at the time) allowed each other to be victims.

https://twitter.com/MichaelAvenatti/...60428730843136

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoBx3JaWkAEAyhX.jpg:small
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoBx6BUWkAYL7aU.jpg:small

The woman graduated in 1980. She claims this happened "Around 1982." ...So, was she attending high school parties where gang rapes were occurring? Yet another story with tons of holes (color me shocked).
https://hotair.com/archives/2018/09/...omorrow-still/

Ford's polygraph results released. She was asked two questions!!! [LOL]

The questions were based on the hand written statement which changes the number of witnesses at the house and doesn't specifically mention Kavanaugh mentions Brett. Does mention Mark Judge by name.

https://twitter.com/yashar/status/1045017188929687552

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoClf7NU0AAB9k_.jpg:small
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoClf8KU0AAT0r6.jpg:small
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoClf_GUcAA9Zhl.jpg:small

I may be entirely wrong on this, but I think this "third victim" might actually help Kavanaugh's chances at confirmation rather than harm them. This affidavit is so poorly written, incomprehensibly vague, it's outrageous in the context of the claims and it just reeks of being a hastily prepared outline of lies.

The behavior detailed, not by those alleged of wrongdoing, but by this woman herself is just morally reprehensible. By her own admission she was: an adult going to underage drinking parties, a second year college student hanging out with high-schoolers, attended about 10 of these parties where gang rapes and the illegal drugging of minors took place, never reported any of these brutal and serious crimes (that no one else, including God knows how many supposed victims, reported either, to anyone) and never told anyone for decades. This is so over-the-top that it's almost impossible to believe.

I'm waiting for the 4th victim to show up and say she was abducted by aliens who, with the help of Kavanaugh, conducted sexual experiments on her in their spaceship.

that hand written note done by a 3rd grader?

I think three people should be investigated by the FBI, and they are the 3 people accusing 1 person of wrong doing. After all, when the cops investigate a crime do they not look at everyone as possible suspects? And what ever happened to being innocent until proven guilty. Where's the proof? That's right, there ain't NONE......

She had no issues going to Maryland for a 2 question poly, but made the senate bend to her demands for more time because flying gave her flashbacks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bailey Guns

I may be entirely wrong on this, but I think this "third victim" might actually help Kavanaugh's chances at confirmation rather than harm them. This affidavit is so poorly written, incomprehensibly vague, it's outrageous in the context of the claims and it just reeks of being a hastily prepared outline of lies.

The behavior detailed, not by those alleged of wrongdoing, but by this woman herself is just morally reprehensible. By her own admission she was: an adult going to underage drinking parties, a second year college student hanging out with high-schoolers, attended about 10 of these parties where gang rapes and the illegal drugging of minors took place, never reported any of these brutal and serious crimes (that no one else, including God knows how many supposed victims, reported either, to anyone) and never told anyone for decades. This is so over-the-top that it's almost impossible to believe.

I'm waiting for the 4th victim to show up and say she was abducted by aliens who, with the help of Kavanaugh, conducted sexual experiments on her in their spaceship.

---

Yes!!! I'm seeing this same opinion a lot today! And after hours of debate and review, I am coming to agree.

The next level is snuff films, then aliens after that. But only if the aliens are Republicans.


P.S. If I seem wound up on this topic, I am. This is our Republic being destroyed right in front of us. We finally win a big election and have the chance to change the court and it is being denied. Not through the proper course of debate/confirmation but fraud.

If Kavanaugh gets pushed through to the objections of the Lib Oligarchy and their army of mouth-breathing feminists/SJWs, you can expect a disregard for the Court and violence. If Kavanaugh doesn't get through, we surrender to thugs and the big pockets who are funding this (we still don't know who).

Every thread where we discuss the merits of voting for the Court (Foxtrot is right!!!) reinforces how important this is.

I'm pissed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Great-Kazoo

She had no issues going to Maryland for a 2 question poly, but made the senate bend to her demands for more time because flying gave her flashbacks.

---

And look at that date: August 10, 2018.

That's enough time to WALK to DC!

This was held to the last minute because it would have fallen apart in July/Aug. It's falling apart now after two weeks!

Ramirez and Swetnick are worse. The statements they've made (declaration and media) are incredible and contradict within themselves.

I agree with you, Skip. I've never been more infuriated at the lack of adherence to procedure and the complete disregard for the rule of law, not to mention decency, as I am at democrats right now.

The current democrat party is the greatest, most dangerous and imminent threat to the literal survival of our republic. I sincerely don't believe that's hyperbole in any way. They are destroying the foundation of our system of government right before our eyes.

And the worst part about it is you and I have almost no voice to make our opinions and displeasure heard. Almost the entirety of the media is nothing more than the propaganda wing of the democrat party.

Democrats are pure evil. I truly believe that. And I also believe the only weapon they have left in their arsenal is violence. If Kavanaugh is confirmed, and if the midterms don't go in favor of democrats, I'm convinced they will increasingly resort to violence. They've tried everything else.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bailey Guns

I'm waiting for the 4th victim to show up and say she was abducted by aliens who, with the help of Kavanaugh, conducted sexual experiments on her in their spaceship.

---

Ask and ye shall receive (well, close enough): https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2018...woman-in-1998/

FFS...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RblDiver

Ask and ye shall receive (well, close enough): https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2018...woman-in-1998/

---

Letter sent September 24, 2018. Two days ago!

This is what the GOP has invited with every delay and was probably the reason for Ford's stalling tactics all along. We still don't know if testimony is happening tomorrow.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bailey Guns

I agree with you, Skip. I've never been more infuriated at the lack of adherence to procedure and the complete disregard for the rule of law, not to mention decency, as I am at democrats right now.

The current democrat party is the greatest, most dangerous and imminent threat to the literal survival of our republic. I sincerely don't believe that's hyperbole in any way. They are destroying the foundation of our system of government right before our eyes.

And the worst part about it is you and I have almost no voice to make our opinions and displeasure heard. Almost the entirety of the media is nothing more than the propaganda wing of the democrat party.

Democrats are pure evil. I truly believe that. And I also believe the only weapon they have left in their arsenal is violence. If Kavanaugh is confirmed, and if the midterms don't go in favor of democrats, I'm convinced they will increasingly resort to violence. They've tried everything else.

---

Well said! I think there are low-info people who read headlines caught up in these accusations but it's past time for any reasonable person to think the Democrat party is anything but "Party over all." There are people who think blocking Kavanaugh (views on abortion, constructionism) is worth any price.

I struggle think of these people as Americans. But the probably think their fight is well grounded in the Constitution.

To elaborate on potential violence...

https://farleftwatch.com/antifa-podc...assassination/

Quote:

---

“Hey quick little question for military minded lefties: should leftists train/organize in a “insurgent” focus where they blend into a civilian population for potential attacks or a more “militia” structure focused on holding/maintaining turf?”
[snip]

At one point he asked if “ambushes” and “assassinations” would be more effective in southern states. He also suggest using “easily concealable [weapons] platforms” so as not to “tip anyone off”.

---

They are mapping out terrorism and clearly planning to project violence into Conservative areas of the country. It doesn't take much imagination to see how this could all come together during an uncertain time.

And working to create confusion on legitimacy...

Oregon Sen. Jeff Merkley seeks injunction to delay Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court vote

https://www.oregonlive.com/politics/..._injuncti.html

How many Leftists think hamstringing the Legislative using judicial activists ("judge in Hawaii") is appropriate? And on the very issue of judicial confirmations! To even ask this, risking a Constitutional crisis, tells us all we need to know about Dims.

Good info. Excellent posts Skip!

The Senate can ignore any injunction. What is that judge going to do?

I listened to a bit on the way in. This is a fucking witch trial. Dems are making her a couragous hero, trauma survivor, etc. Reps are being extra gingerly, and she has trouble keeping her story straight. Uses a bunch of scientific terms to bolster all her claims and keeps correcting things.
This is like a one sided canguroo court, it's like she and all the stupid senators are testifying.
If they get away with this rule of law is dead. Anyone can and will be tried for anything at anytime. There is a reason court proceedings have a certain structure, and these hearings just threw out all legal precedence and history
Fuck I'm mad. Mad enough to vote straight R no questions asked. Mad enough to voulenteer for a local campaign.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Eric P

The Senate can ignore any injunction. What is that judge going to do?

---

If the judge (in Hawaii) is stupid enough to go for it, create a massive Constitutional crisis.

---

Tons of news overnight and I hope everyone is following this and watching as much testimony today as possible. I don't have links to everything.

We learned that accuser #4 was anonymous letter sent to Cory Gardner from Denver on Sept 24th (after the circus began). The media didn't really correct the record, they just dropped the story. We are back down to 3 accusers who are all named.

Twitchy (of all places) broke a story that Swetnick (accuser #3) was previously represented by Katz who is currently representing Ford. This is a coincidence and has nothing to do a Rolodex of willing participants...

https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2018...ng-connection/

Swetnick was paid a settlement. This, along with "racial discrimination" settlements, is a known racket.

Swetnick was also the subject of a restraining order from some drama with an exboyfriend in which she allegedly threatened him and his family well after their breakup.

Seems mental.

---

Testimony is a circus as we expect. We're learning more about the timelines. IMHO Ford seemed well prepped, unable to deviate from script, and very fragile. Social reaction is very divided.

Ford went to media before Feinstein...

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/huge-b...ampaign=buffer


Feinstein hasn't participated in the investigation...

https://twitter.com/senjudiciary/sta...57321361260544


Ford says she doesn't know who paid for polygraph. Ford's team has refused to release any of the poly details beyond what was released yesterday. There is video! The poly was administered on the same day as her grandmother's funeral so she says she was rushed.

All of this involved air travel which has come up multiple times. She claims she is claustrophobic.

Ford's team will not release the medical record/therapist notes citing privacy but Ford continues to refer that session as proof she discussed the assault prior to the nomination.

https://twitter.com/NoahCRothman/sta...44833911619585

Some portion of those notes were provided to WashPoo but she can't recall doing it.

https://twitter.com/RobGeorge/status...41587277049857


She was asked about the inconsistencies in the number of witnesses she initially claim and dismissed it due to bad memory. She still can't say where it happened or when. She doesn't remember how she got to the house or home. She thinks she was driven. She offered to draw a floorplan of the house in which it happened.

In spite of "bad memory" she remains consistent that it was Brett Kavanaugh.

Senate seems to be entrenched in camps but all eyes are on Collins and Murkowsk. They are likely debating the factual inconsistencies with the optics of "war of women."

I'm sure there will be clips, recaps, and more solid links coming all day.

Thanks for the update. I'm feeling like Erni and I can't bear to read the hyperventilating WaPoo or other clearly liberal media to see what is going on. Even Fox News had some liberal on there spouting off about how this is the end of the republican party.

What struck me as odd about Ford's testimony is she never said that she told the person who assaulted her to stop nor did she say "no", etc. If she did I missed it. Now that doesn't give the person permission by any means...but it strikes me as odd. Every sex assault I ever investigated the victim said they told the suspect to stop...unless they were incapacitated.

She also speaks like a 16 year old valley girl and comes across to me as very naive and fragile and not very intelligent for someone who's a doctor.

The Democrat senators are predictably pathetic and dishonest.

I also noticed she emphasized a few points that people were questioning before. She's been well prepared, no doubt.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bailey Guns

What struck me as odd about Ford's testimony is she never said that she told the person who assaulted her to stop nor did she say "no", etc. If she did I missed it. Now that doesn't give the person permission by any means...but it strikes me as odd. Every sex assault I ever investigated the victim said they told the suspect to stop...unless they were incapacitated.

She also speaks like a 16 year old valley girl and comes across to me as very naive and fragile and not very intelligent for someone who's a doctor.

The Democrat senators are predictably pathetic and dishonest.

---

She claims Kavanaugh covered her mouth to muffle her screams and that there was music playing in the room. She says Kavanaugh held her down with the weight of his body on a bed while he tried to remove her clothes.

This has been dissected a bit on the socials because it creates a nuance for witness statements (e.g. being there but hearing/seeing nothing). To which it's been pointed out the witnesses didn't even put Kavanaugh at ANY party with Ford.

I think you are right about the preparation and I think the fill in of these critical details was well rehearsed. The testimony was very detailed about the emotional aspects of the alleged assault but not the details that would substantiate Ford's claim.

---

Sheila Jackson Lee is caught on camera handing a note to Bromwich (second Ford counsel)... Speculation that it was questioning info.

(I can't embed Twitter vids, but you can watch at link)

https://twitter.com/therealcornett/s...57993246838789