Printable View
I overheard on the radio, or maybe it was 9news, that the CO AG released a letter of what he interprets...
It's pretty long, but in short, one of the big important things I took away from it is that if you have a 15-rounder, it's okay, forget the "may be extended", they'll only prosecute if you actually do extend it.
https://www.coloradoattorneygeneral....gazine_ban.pdf
The problem being that the AG's interpretation is a guideline only, and carries zero authority legally. He has no authority over the various prosecutors that will be deciding to charge people under this statute.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin13
How does anyone know who owns what? Unless you volunteer the info. I'd be more concerned with, If my wife wants her XD back, will she shoot me for it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Superorb
What's the problem? Your wife has always owned the XD along with the 16rd mags. Right?Quote:
Originally Posted by Superorb
This is wording in the CO AG's Technical Guidance letter:
"However, the bill prohibits the owner of a large-capacity magazine from selling or transferring it after July 1, 2013" and he goes on and on ------.[blah-blah]
The way this is worded, he makes it sound like we cannot ever sell these hi-cap mags to ANYONE after July 1, 2013, even if they are taken it out of the great State of CO to be sold in some other State that still allows possession of them. That's the way it is worded or at least the way I interpret it although there would be no way in hell that they could enforce our not being able to sell them outside of CO.
Looks like our wonderful AG will have to add a few words to his "letter of guidance" [fail]
Wow, sure hope this is not considered a REPOST!!!!!!
The issue is when both of you die your kids or anybody else can't get them. That is the plan from those that wrote that POS.Quote:
Originally Posted by Superorb
Wonderful... They really are trying to eliminate guns. It's a war of attrition. 1,000 cuts.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hound